C.I.T.- I JODHPUR vs. SHRI SACHIYAYA MATAJI TRUST, OSIAN
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the instant appeal filed by the Revenue. The dismissal was based on the tax effect of Rs.55,33,866/-, which was found to be below the monetary limit prescribed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in its Circular dated 17.09.2024 for filing appeals before the High Court. The Circular stipulated a monetary limit of Rs.2 crore for appeals before the High Court. The Court noted that the proposed substantial question of law was kept open to be adjudicated in future appropriate proceedings. Any pending applications were also disposed of.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Jodhpur (Revenue) against the order dated 21.11.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur Bench. The ITAT had dismissed the Revenue's appeal, thereby upholding the order dated 28.03.2013 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jodhpur. The assessment year in question was 2007-08. The tax effect in the present appeal was stated to be Rs.55,33,866/-. The High Court heard the appeal and perused the file.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable before the High Court given the tax effect and the prevailing monetary limits for filing appeals as per CBDT Circulars. The Revenue contended that the appeal was filed against the order of the ITAT. The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the Revenue regarding the merits of the case or the substantial question of law. The judgment also does not record any arguments made by the Respondent (Shri Sachiyaya Mataji Trust).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Order (Oral) 13/05/2026 Per : Arun Monga, J
The instant appeal impugns the final order dated 21.11.2013 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, for Assessment Year 2007-08. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and confirmed the order dated 28.03.2013 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jodhpur.
Heard and perused the file.
The tax effect in the present appeal is Rs.55,33,866/-, which is below the limit prescribed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in its Circular dated 17.09.2024. Circular, ibid reads as under:- “Sub:- Further enhancement of Monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court: amendment to Circular 5 of 2024- Measures for reducing litigation - Reg. Reference is invited to Circular No 5/2024 (F.No.279/Misc.142/2007- ITJ(Pt.)) dated 15.03.2024 of Central Board of Direct Taxes (the 'Board') vide which monetary limits for filing of income tax appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLP/appeals before Supreme Court have been specified. Further, (Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 03:54:42 PM) (Downloaded on 28/10/2026 at 12:41:01 AM)
[2026:RJ-JD:22928-DB] (2 of 2) [ITA-100/2014] exceptions to the monetary limits were also specified vide paras 3.1 and 3.2 of the said Circular.
As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of appeals in Income-tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows: SI No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-Tax Matters Monetary Limit(Tax effect in ) ₹
Before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 60 Lakh
Before High Court 2 crore
Before Supreme Court 5 crore
Monetary limits given in paragraph 2 above with regard to filing appeal/SLP shall be applicable to all cases including those relating to TDS/TCS under the Income-tax Act, 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the decision to appeal/file SLP shall be taken on merits, without regard to the tax effect and the monetary limits.
It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an appeal.
The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ appeals pending before Supreme Court/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn.
The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.
This issues under section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.”
The instant appeal is dismissed in light of the circular, ibid. The proposed substantial question of law is kept open to be adjudicated in appropriate proceedings in future.
Any pending applications stand disposed of. (SANDEEP SHAH),J (ARUN MONGA),J 62-mohit/- Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) (Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 03:54:42 PM) (Downloaded on 28/10/2026 at 12:41:01 AM)
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026