Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) Bhopal vs. M/S Maharashi World Peace Trust Mcee Campus Lambakheda Berasia Road
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the appeal deserved to be dismissed. The Tribunal's reasoning, which was quoted and affirmed, stated that Section 12AA(1) of the Income Tax Act requires the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to be satisfied about the objects and genuineness of the activities of the Trust or Institution. The Tribunal found no requirement in Section 12AA for a trust to be mandatorily registered as a Public Charitable Trust under the local law of the State where it is located. Therefore, the action of the CIT(E) in denying registration solely on the basis of non-registration under the MP Public Trust Act, 1951, was not justified. The High Court found no infirmity in the Tribunal's order and concluded that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. The appeal was accordingly dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) appealed an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ITAT had allowed an appeal filed by M/s Maharashi World Peace Trust (the assessee) and set aside an order passed by the CIT(E), Bhopal. The assessee had applied for registration under Section 12AA(1)(b)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(E) rejected the application on the grounds that the assessee Trust was not registered under the Madhya Pradesh Public Trust Act, 1951. The ITAT, however, held that such local registration was not a prerequisite for obtaining registration under Section 12AA of the Act.
What were the issues?
1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is correct in holding that a public charitable Trust does not require to comply with the local law of MP requiring registration under the MP Public Trust Act, 1951? (Question of law) 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is correct in holding that the genuineness of the activities of the trust does not include compliance with the requirement of local law, namely the MP Public Trust Act? (Question of mixed law and fact) Assessee's arguments: Not explicitly recorded in the judgment. Revenue's arguments: The assessee Trust was required to produce a copy of its registration as a Public Charitable Trust under the MP Public Trust Act, 1951, during the pendency of its application under Section 12AA. The assessee failed to provide satisfactory replies or the required certificate. The ITAT erred in holding that the genuineness of activities does not include compliance with local law. The ITAT did not controvert the grounds on which the CIT(E) denied approval.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 260-A,Section 12AA,Section 12AA(1),Section 12AA(1)(b)(i)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
I.T.A No.61/2019 ---1--- HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR (Coram: Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla, Judge) I.T.A No.61/2019 Commissioner of Income Tax
…..............Appellant Vs. M/s Maharashi World Peace Trust …........ Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: Shri Sanjay Lal, Advocate for the appellant/Department. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O R D E R (Oral) (6.1.2020) Per : Ajay Kumar Mittal, Chief Justice This appeal has been filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) challenging the order dated 12.10.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “the Tribunal”), Indore in ITA No.553/Ind/2017 whereby the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed and the order passed by the CIT(E), Bhopal was set aside. 2. The appellant has claimed the following substantial questions of law:- “1. Whether, on the facts & circumstances of the case, and in law, the ITAT is correct in holding that a public charitable Trust does not require to comply with local law of MP requiring registration under MP Public Trust Act 1951 ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT is correct in holding that genuineness of the activities of the trust does not include I.T.A No.61/2019 ---2--- compliance with requirement of local law namely MP Public Trust Act ?”
Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent-M/s Maharashi World Peace Trust (for short “the assessee Trust”) applied for registration under Section 12AA(1)(b)(i) of the Act before the CIT(E), Bhopal. The said application was rejected on the ground that the assessee Trust was not registered as a public Charitable Trust. The order passed by the CIT(E), Bhopal was challenged in an appeal before the Tribunal, who in turn, set aside the order passed by the CIT(E), Bhopal and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee Trust holding that the action of learned CIT(E), Bhopal denying the registration merely for the reason that the assessee trust was not registered as Public Charitable Trust cannot be held to be justified. Being aggrieved by the said order of the Tribunal, the department has preferred the present appeal. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant/Department submitted that during the pendency of the application under Section 12AA of the Act, the assessee Trust was required to produce copy of registration as Public Charitable Trust but neither the satisfactory reply nor the certificate of registration as Public Charitable Trust with the Registrar of Madhya Pradesh Public Trust was submitted by it. It was further submitted that the learned Tribunal has erred in holding that genuineness of the activities of the trust does not include compliance with the requirement of local law namely M.P. Public Trust Act. Further, the Tribunal did not controvert the ground on which the approval was denied by the CIT(E), Bhopal. Accordingly, it was prayed that this appeal may be allowed by setting aside the order impugned in this appeal. I.T.A No.61/2019 ---3--- 5. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant/Department, we are of the considered opinion that the present appeal deserve to be dismissed. 6. The learned Tribunal while dealing with the argument of learned counsel for the assessee Trust regarding rejection of application filed under Section 12AA of the Act for the reason that the assessee Trust was not registered as a Public Trust as per M.P. Public Trust Act, 1951 has negatived the said finding of the CIT(E), Bhopal and held as under:- “6. As per the provisions of Section 12AA(1) of the Act provides that “Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, on receipt of application for registration of the Trust or Institution made under Clause a or Clause aa of Sub-Section 1 of Section 12A can call for such documents or information as he thinks necessary in order to satisfy himself about the objects and genuineness of activities of the Trust or Institution and also make such enquiries as he may deem necessary in this behalf and after satisfying himself about the objects of the Trust or Institution and the genuineness of its activities he may pass an order in writing registering the Trust or Institution or if he is not so satisfied, he may pass an order in writing refusing to register the Trust or Institution. Provision of Section 12AA(1) of the Act refers to the “Trust or Institution”. There seems to be no requirement for a trust to be mandatorily registered as a Public Charitable trust in the State of India where it is located. The action of Ld. CIT-Exemptions denying the registration merely for the reason that the assessee Trust was not registered as a public Charitable Trust cannot be held to be justified.” 7. In the present case, the registration was applied for by the respondent under Section 12AA(1)(b)(i) of the Act and the provisions under Section 12AA(1) of the Act also refers to the “trust or institution” and there is no mandate under Section 12AA of the Act that the application seeking exemption is required to be applied only by a registered Trust or Institution I.T.A No.61/2019 ---4--- under the local laws i.e. M.P. Public Trust Act, 1951. The learned Tribunal considering the provisions of Section 12AA(1) of the Act has specifically held that for registering the Trust or Institution for the purposes of the said Act, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, is required to satisfy itself about the objects of the applicant – Trust or Institution and the genuineness of its activities. Under the said provision, there is no requirement for a Trust to be mandatorily registered as a Public Charitable Trust under the local Act. In the absence of any provision requiring registration as a Public Charitable Trust before applying for registration under Section 12AA(1) of the Act, the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal cannot be faulted and said to be illegal or perverse in any manner. 8. In view of the aforesaid, we do not find any reason to take a different view from the one taken by the learned Tribunal as there was no statutory requirement under the Act for the assessee Trust to get itself registered under any law before applying for registration. No infirmity could be found in the order of learned Tribunal warranting interference. Therefore, no substantial question of law arises for consideration. 9. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Mittal) (Vijay Kumar Shukla)
Chief Justice Judge
Anchal Digitally signed by ANCHAL KHARE Date: 2020.02.01 12:15:14 +05'30'
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026