The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. M/S Shree Vignesh Warehouse And Distributors Pvt. Ltd.

PDF · subscribers
ITA/21/2015HC Madhya Pradesh24 January 2017Bench: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE2 pages
For Petitioner: Sanjay Lal
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The Court observed that the question involved in the present appeal had already been answered by it in prior appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. These prior appeals concerned co-assessees, Dr. Yogiraj Sharma and Shri Gaurav Sharma & Ors., and were dismissed on March 29, 2016, and August 2, 2016, respectively. Given the consistent stance taken in these earlier judgments, the High Court saw no reason for further indulgence and found no merit in the Revenue's appeal. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The appeal pertains to various assessment years. The High Court noted that the issue involved in this appeal had already been decided by it in previous appeals filed by the Revenue concerning co-assessees, Dr. Yogiraj Sharma and Shri Gaurav Sharma & Ors. These prior appeals were dismissed by the High Court on March 29, 2016, and August 2, 2016, respectively.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the High Court should entertain the Revenue's appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when similar appeals involving the same core issue concerning co-assessees have already been decided by this Court. Contentions: Assessee: Not recorded. Revenue: The Revenue filed the present appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the ITAT's order. The judgment does not explicitly detail the Revenue's specific arguments beyond filing the appeal. However, the High Court's decision to dismiss the appeal implies that the Revenue's grounds were not found to be tenable or persuasive in light of previous judgments.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

ITA-00021-2015 24-01-2017 Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respondents. This is the appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act calling in question the tenability of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for various assessment years. Except for difference in the years of assessment, the question involved in this appeal stands answered by this Court in the appeal filed under Section 260-A by the revenue (Appeal) in the case of coassessee Dr. Yogiraj Sharma in ITA No.52/2015, wherein, similar appeals of the revenue have been rejected by this Court on 29th of March, 2016 and in ITA Nos.29-31-34-36-41-42/2015 & ITA No.43/2015 decided by a common order on 2.8.2016, where the appeals filed by another co-assessees, Shri Gaurav Sharma & Ors. have been rejected. In view of the order already passed in the appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act on 2.8.2016 and on 29.3.2016, we see no reason to make any further indulgence into the matter and for the grounds and reasons already indicated in the orders passed on 2.8.2016 & 29.3.2016, this appeal filed by the revenue fails. With the aforesaid, this appeal stands dismissed. (RAJENDRA MENON) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (H.P. SINGH) JUDGE

More judgments on Section 260-A

All 2,570 judgments and leading authorities on Section 260-A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →