THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S CHANDRAPRABHU INTERNATIONA

PDF · subscribers
ITA/917/2006HC DelhiDLHC01062420200616 March 2017Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The Delhi High Court, in its judgment dated 16.02.2017 in Rollatainers Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITA 166/2004), had already answered the common question of law in favour of the assessee. This decision followed the Madras High Court ruling in CIT v. Madras Motors Ltd., 257 ITR 60. Consequently, the question of law was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. The High Court found that the Tribunal's conclusion regarding the definition of 'total turnover' for Section 80HHC was correct. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.

What were the facts?

The appeals were filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The assessee is M/s Chandraprabhu International. The assessment years are not explicitly stated but the appeals are from 2006. The core issue revolves around the interpretation of 'total turnover' for the purpose of Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Revenue challenged the ITAT's conclusion that only export business turnover should be considered, irrespective of whether separate books of account were maintained for export business. The procedural history indicates these appeals were decided by the Delhi High Court.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in its conclusion that the total turnover in Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is only the turnover relating to the export business of the assessee and not a turnover relating to other businesses of the assessee irrespective of whether for the export business separate books of account have been maintained? Assessee's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment. Revenue's contentions: The Revenue argued that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation of 'total turnover' under Section 80HHC, implying that turnover from other businesses should also be considered. The Revenue's argument is implicitly against the ITAT's finding.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80HHC

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

$~42, 43, 45 & 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +

ITA Nos.450/2006, 917/2006, 974/2006 & 1408/2006

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel.

versus

M/S CHANDRAPRABHU INTERNATIONAL ..... Respondent

Through: None.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R %

16.03.2017

The common question of law in these appeals is as follows: - “Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in its conclusion that the total turnover in Section 80 HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is only the turnover relating to the export business of the assessee and not a turnover relating to other businesses of the assessee irrespective of whether for the export business separate books of account have been maintained?”

This Court had in its judgment (delivered on 16.02.2017) Rollatainers Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITA 166/2004) answered the said question in favour of the assessee ITA Nos.450, 917, 974 & 1408/2006

Page 1 of 2

which had followed the Madras High Court ruling in CIT v. Madras Motors Ltd., 257 ITR 60. As a result, the question of law is answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. ITA Nos.450/2006, 917/2006, 974/2006 and 1408/2006 are dismissed.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J

NAJMI WAZIRI, J MARCH 16, 2017 /vikas/

ITA Nos.450, 917, 974 & 1408/2006

Page 2 of 2

More judgments on Section 80HHC

All 1,083 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80HHC →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →