CIT vs. ORACLE INDIA PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that no question of law arises from the ITAT's order. Regarding the first issue, the Court found the matter covered against the Revenue by the Supreme Court's judgment in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Oracle Software India Ltd., 320 ITR 546, which presumably dealt with the definition of manufacturing in the context of software. For the second issue, the Court noted that the Revenue had already unsuccessfully litigated this very question concerning the assessee in ITA No. 690/2009, which was dismissed by the High Court, and a subsequent Special Leave Petition was also dismissed by the Supreme Court. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
This appeal by the Revenue challenges an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The assessee is a company engaged in software development. The assessment year(s) are not explicitly stated. The dispute concerns the eligibility of the assessee for deductions under Section 80-IA for duplicating software and under Section 10A for income from its Bangalore software development center. The ITAT had ruled in favor of the assessee on both counts. The Revenue has appealed this decision to the High Court.
What were the issues?
The High Court was asked to decide two questions of law: 1. Whether the ITAT was correct in holding that the assessee's activity of duplicating software on blank discs using a master copy constituted manufacturing, qualifying for deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Whether the ITAT was correct in allowing deduction under Section 10A of the Act to the assessee for income earned from its software development center in Bangalore. For the first issue, the Revenue contended that software duplication does not amount to manufacturing. For the second issue, the Revenue had previously raised the same question in ITA No. 690/2009, which was dismissed by the High Court, and a Special Leave Petition against that dismissal was also dismissed by the Supreme Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . 06.04.2011 . Present: Ms.Prem Lata Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Deepak Anand, Advocate for the appellant. Ms.Husnal Sayali, Advocate for the respondent. . +ITA No.606/2011 . Two questions of law are proposed in this appeal, which are as under:- (i) Whether ITAT was correct in law in holding that the activity of the assessee of duplicating software on blank disc with the help of master copy amounted to manufacturing activity, eligible for deduction under Section 80-IA of the act? . (ii) Whether ITAT was correct in law in allowing deduction under Section 10A of the Act to the assessee in respect of income earned by the assessee from software development centre at Bangalore? . Insofar as first question is concerned, the same is covered against the Revenue in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court passed in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Oracle Software India Ltd., 320 ITR 546. As far as second question is concerned, raising this very question in the case of assessee, Revenue had filed ITA No.690/2009, which was dismissed vide order dated 31.07.2009. We are informed that special leave petition filed against that order was also dismissed by the Supreme Court. . ITA No.606/2011 Page 1 of 2 In view thereof, no question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed accordingly. . . A.K. SIKRI, J. . . . . APRIL 06, 2011 M.L. MEHTA, J. Dev . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITA No.606/2011 Page 2 of 2 .
More judgments on Section 80-IA
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- DCIT, Central Circle- 2(4), Chennai vs Eco Protection Engineers Private Limited…ITA 597/CHNY/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited, Kolkata vs DCIT, Central Circle 1(1), KolkataITTPA 12/KOL/2026[2022-2023]Status: Heard11 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- State Bank of India, Mumbai vs ACIT-Circle- 2(2)(1), MumbaiITA 3429/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026