DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(4), CHENNAI vs. ECO PROTECTION ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which deleted the disallowance of deduction under Section 80-IA made by the Assessing Officer. The assessee, an EPC contractor, claimed deduction for profits derived from infrastructure projects undertaken for government agencies.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was eligible for deduction under Section 80-IA as it was engaged in developing infrastructure projects, and its status as a contractor did not preclude eligibility. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case on similar facts.
What were the issues?
Whether an EPC contractor executing infrastructure projects for government agencies is eligible for deduction under Section 80-IA, and whether the assessee's contractual role disqualifies it from such deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80-IA,Section 143(3),Section 2(24)(x),Section 36(1)(va)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA
PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM : This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal (Appeals), Chennai – 19, [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”], dated 19.11.2025, arising from the assessment order dated 27.11.2019 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 passed by the Assista
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80-IA
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Shyam Metalics and Energy Limited, Kolkata vs DCIT, Central Circle 1(1), KolkataITTPA 12/KOL/2026[2022-2023]Status: Heard11 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- State Bank of India, Mumbai vs ACIT-Circle- 2(2)(1), MumbaiITA 3429/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- DCIT- 2(2)(1), Mumbai vs State Bank of India, MumbaiITA 3395/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nagarbhavi Club (R) vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 6 Oct 2026
- Newton Engineering And Chemicals Limited vs. Indian Oil Corporation LTD.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Life Insurance Corporation Of INDIA vs. N.S. Associates PVT. LTDDelhi · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Ideal Pharma, Through Its Proprietor Manish Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Surya Agro Fuels vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesMadras · 6 Oct 2026