COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SENIOR BUILDERS

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 1207 / 2010HC Delhi20 August 20101 pages
For Petitioner: SONIA MATHUR
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court admitted the appeal on two substantial questions of law. The first question concerns the correct computation of the time period to be excluded under sub-clause (i) of the Explanation to Section 153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The second question pertains to whether the period allowed for conducting a special audit under Section 142(2A) should be excluded when computing the limitation period under Section 153B. The judgment does not record any findings or decisions by the Tribunal on these issues, nor does it provide the reasoning or ratio decidendi. The High Court's action was limited to admitting the appeal and issuing notice. No operative directions were issued, and no issues were left undecided as the substantive decision on the merits is yet to be made.

What were the facts?

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellant) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal). The appeal concerns the assessment year(s) not explicitly stated in the provided text. The core of the dispute revolves around the computation of the time period to be excluded for the purpose of computing the limitation period under Section 153B of the Act. The Appellant challenges the Tribunal's interpretation of the exclusion period, specifically concerning the time allowed for a special audit under Section 142(2A). The Respondent, Senior Builders, was represented by no one. The High Court admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law.

What were the issues?

The High Court admitted the appeal on two substantial questions of law: 1. Whether the Tribunal has correctly computed the time period to be excluded under sub-clause (i) of Explanation to Section 153B of the Act? 2. Whether on the facts of the present case, the period allowed to carry out the special audit under Section 142(2A) was liable to be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation under Section 153B of the Act? The Assessee's contentions are not recorded in the provided text. The Revenue's arguments are not explicitly detailed, but the appeal itself, filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, implies disagreement with the Tribunal's findings on the aforementioned questions of law. The Revenue relies on Section 260A for preferring the appeal and Section 153B and Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the provisions governing the dispute.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A,Section 153B,Section 142(2A)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . ITA 1207/2010 . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sonia Mathur, Advocate. . versus . SENIOR BUILDERS ..... Respondent Through: None. . . CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN . O R D E R 20.08.2010 CM No. 14515/2010 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, application stands disposed of. . . ITA 1207/2010 The present appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ?Act?) is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- 1. Whether the tribunal has correctly computed the time period to be excluded under sub-clause (i) of Explanation to Section 153B of the Act? . ITA 1207/2010 page 1 of 2. . 2. Whether on the facts of the present case, period allowed to carry out the special audit under Section 142 (2A) was liable to be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation under Section 153B of Act? . Issue notice. . . CHIEF JUSTICE . . MANMOHAN, J AUGUST 20, 2010 js . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITA 1207/2010 page 2 of 2. . 11 $

More judgments on Section 153B

All 671 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →