COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. VIJAY DIXIT

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 1201 / 2010HC Delhi20 August 20101 pages
For Petitioner: SONIA MATHUR
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court of Delhi admitted the appeal on two substantial questions of law concerning the computation of limitation periods under Section 153B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The first question pertains to the correct computation of the time period to be excluded under sub-clause (i) of the Explanation to Section 153B. The second question concerns whether the period allowed for a special audit under Section 142(2A) should be excluded for the purpose of computing the limitation period under Section 153B. The Court did not provide any findings or reasoning on these issues in the excerpt provided, as it only recorded the admission of the appeal and the issuance of notice. The operative directions were limited to admitting the appeal and issuing notice. No issue was expressly left undecided, as the merits of the questions of law were not addressed.

What were the facts?

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellant) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The appeal was admitted on two substantial questions of law concerning the computation of limitation periods under Section 153B of the Act. The respondent, Vijay Dixit, was represented by no one. The High Court of Delhi admitted the appeal and issued notice. The specific assessment year(s) and the amount in dispute are not recorded in this excerpt. The procedural history leading to the ITAT's order is not detailed.

What were the issues?

The High Court of Delhi admitted the appeal on the following substantial questions of law: 1. Whether the Tribunal correctly computed the time period to be excluded under sub-clause (i) of Explanation to Section 153B of the Act? 2. Whether, on the facts of the present case, the period allowed to carry out the special audit under Section 142(2A) was liable to be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation under Section 153B of the Act? The Appellant (Commissioner of Income Tax) contended that the Tribunal erred in its computation of the limitation period. The Respondent (Vijay Dixit) did not present any arguments as no one appeared on their behalf. The judgment does not record any specific authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon by either party.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A,Section 153B,Section 142(2A)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . ITA 1201/2010 . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sonia Mathur, Advocate. . versus . VIJAY DIXIT ..... Respondent Through: None. . CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN . O R D E R 20.08.2010 CM No. 14511/2010 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, application stands disposed of. ITA 1201/2010 . . The present appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ?Act?) is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- 1. Whether the tribunal has correctly computed the time period to be excluded under sub-clause (i) of Explanation to Section 153B of the Act? . ITA 1201/2010 page 1 of 2. . 2. Whether on the facts of the present case, period allowed to carry out the special audit under Section 142 (2A) was liable to be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation under Section 153B of Act? . Issue notice. . . CHIEF JUSTICE . . MANMOHAN, J AUGUST 20, 2010 js . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITA 1201/2010 page 2 of 2. . . 23 $

More judgments on Section 153B

All 671 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →