COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. VIJAY DIXIT

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 1197 / 2010HC Delhi20 August 20101 pages
For Petitioner: SONIA MATHUR
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The provided text is an order admitting the appeal and framing substantial questions of law. It does not contain the Tribunal's decision or reasoning. Therefore, what the Tribunal decided, the reasoning that led to it, the ratio, and the operative directions are not recorded in this excerpt. The judgment does not mention any issue expressly left undecided. The appeal was admitted on the substantial questions of law concerning the computation of exclusion periods under Section 153B and the exclusion of special audit time under Section 142(2A) for limitation purposes.

What were the facts?

This case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellant) against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal). The respondent is Vijay Dixit. The appeal is filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The core of the dispute revolves around the computation of the time period for exclusion under Section 153B of the Act, specifically concerning the period allowed for a special audit under Section 142(2A). The procedural history indicates that the appeal was admitted by the High Court on specific substantial questions of law, and notice was issued to the respondent. No specific assessment years or amounts in dispute are mentioned in the provided text.

What were the issues?

The Tribunal had to decide two substantial questions of law: 1. Whether the tribunal has correctly computed the time period to be excluded under sub-clause (i) of Explanation to Section 153B of the Act? 2. Whether on the facts of the present case, the period allowed to carry out the special audit under Section 142(2A) was liable to be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation under Section 153B of Act? The Appellant, the Commissioner of Income Tax, is challenging the Tribunal's computation of the exclusion period under Section 153B(i) and the applicability of excluding the special audit period under Section 142(2A) for limitation purposes. The judgment does not record the contentions of the Respondent, Vijay Dixit, or any specific authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon by either side.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A,Section 153B,Section 142(2A)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . ITA 1197/2010 . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sonia Mathur, Advocate. . versus . VIJAY DIXIT ..... Respondent Through: None. . CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN . O R D E R 20.08.2010 CM No. 14508/2010 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, application stands disposed of. ITA 1197/2010 The present appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ?Act?) is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- 1. Whether the tribunal has correctly computed the time period to be excluded under sub-clause (i) of Explanation to Section 153B of the Act? . ITA 1197/2010 page 1 of 2. . 2. Whether on the facts of the present case, period allowed to carry out the special audit under Section 142 (2A) was liable to be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation under Section 153B of Act? . Issue notice. . . CHIEF JUSTICE . . MANMOHAN, J AUGUST 20, 2010 js . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITA 1197/2010 page 2 of 2. . 9 $

More judgments on Section 153B

All 671 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →