COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. VIJAY DIXIT

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 1194 / 2010HC Delhi20 August 20101 pages
For Petitioner: SONIA MATHUR
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The provided text is an order admitting the appeal and framing substantial questions of law. It does not contain the Tribunal's decision or the High Court's findings on the merits of the case. Therefore, what the Tribunal decided, the reasoning, the ratio, and the operative directions are not recorded in this excerpt. The judgment does not record any arguments from the respondent. No issue was expressly left undecided as the appeal was admitted for further hearing.

What were the facts?

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appellant) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The appeal pertains to the assessment year(s) not explicitly stated in the provided text. The core of the dispute revolves around the computation of the time period to be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation under Section 153B of the Act. Specifically, the appeal challenges the ITAT's decision regarding the exclusion of the period allowed for conducting a special audit under Section 142(2A) of the Act. The respondent, Vijay Dixit, was not represented before the High Court.

What were the issues?

The High Court admitted the appeal on the following substantial questions of law: 1. Whether the Tribunal has correctly computed the time period to be excluded under sub-clause (i) of Explanation to Section 153B of the Act? 2. Whether, on the facts of the present case, the period allowed to carry out the special audit under Section 142(2A) was liable to be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation under Section 153B of the Act? The Appellant (Commissioner of Income Tax) is likely arguing that the Tribunal erred in its computation of the exclusion period under Section 153B, particularly concerning the special audit. The Respondent (Vijay Dixit) did not present any arguments as none were recorded.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260A,Section 153B,Section 142(2A)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . ITA 1194/2010 . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sonia Mathur, Advocate. . versus . VIJAY DIXIT ..... Respondent Through: None. . CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN . O R D E R 20.08.2010 CM No. 14505/2010 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, application stands disposed of. ITA 1194/2010 The present appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ?Act?) is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- 1. Whether the tribunal has correctly computed the time period to be excluded under sub-clause (i) of Explanation to Section 153B of the Act? . ITA 1194/2010 page 1 of 2. . 2. Whether on the facts of the present case, period allowed to carry out the special audit under Section 142 (2A) was liable to be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation under Section 153B of Act? . Issue notice. . . . . CHIEF JUSTICE . . MANMOHAN, J AUGUST 20, 2010 js . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITA 1194/2010 page 2 of 2. . 18 $

More judgments on Section 153B

All 671 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →