COMMISSIONER OF I.T., PANCHKULA vs. M/S JANKI JI EDUCATION SOCIETY
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration in the appeal. The Court referred to its earlier decision in ITA No. 701 of 2010, where it had dismissed the revenue's appeal against a similar ITAT order. In that decision, the Court clarified that the purpose of Section 12AA is to examine the genuineness of the objects and activities of the trust, not the income of the trust for charitable or religious purposes. The stage for assessing the application of income arises later, when the trust files its return. Therefore, the principles for excluding income under Sections 11, 12, or 10(23C) are not applicable when considering an application for registration under Section 12AA. The High Court found the judgments relied upon by the revenue inapplicable to the facts concerning the registration of a trust.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT), Panchkula, against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ITAT had allowed registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to the respondent-assessee, M/s Janki Ji Education Society, Yamuna Nagar, for the assessment year 2008-09. The CIT had initially declined registration, citing that although the society's activities were charitable, it was run with the motive to earn profit and that its funds were surplus and not utilized for charitable purposes. The ITAT reversed the CIT's order, relying on its previous decision in Surya Educational & Charitable Trust vs. CIT-II, Chandigarh.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the ITAT erred in law by setting aside the CIT's order and allowing registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to the assessee society, despite the CIT's finding that the society was run with the motive to earn profit? Assessee's Contention: Not recorded. Revenue's Contention: The assessee society was being run with the motive/object to earn profit, and its funds were surplus and not utilized for charitable purposes, which warranted denial of registration under Section 12AA. The revenue relied on the findings of the CIT. The High Court's observation, as quoted in the judgment, also discussed the scope of Section 12AA in contrast to Sections 11, 12, and 10(23C), emphasizing that Section 12AA is about examining the genuineness of the objects and activities of the trust, not the income of the trust at the stage of registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 260A,Section 12AA,Section 11,Section 12,Section 10(23C),Section 10(22)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA No.187 of 2012 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH ITA No.187 of 2012 (O & M) Date of Decision: October 04, 2012 Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula
....Petitioner Versus M/s Janki Ji Education Society, Yamuna Nagar
.... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate, for the appellant. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The present appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') against the order dated 20.01.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal'), Bench 'B' passed in ITA No.1103/Chd/2009 for the assessment year 2008-09 claiming the following substantial question of law:- “Whether the Ld. ITAT has erred in law in setting-aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula and allowing registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the applicant society despite the clear findings recorded by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula that though the applicant institutions activities are covered under the definition of charitable purpose, however, it is being run with the motive/object to earn profit.” 3. The issue raised herein relates to grant of registration to the respondent-assessee under Section 12AA of the Act. The appellant had declined the registration to the respondent on the ground that the funds were surplus and were not being utilized for the charitable purpose. The
ITA No.187 of 2012 (O & M) ::2:: said order was reversed by the Tribunal vide order impugned herein by relying upon its earlier decision in Surya Educational & Charitable Trust versus CIT-II, Chandigarh in ITA No.223/Chd/2009. 4. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly admitted that against the aforesaid order, the revenue had approached this Court by way of ITA No.701 of 2010 wherein this Court on 05.10.2011, while dismissing the said appeal had observed as under:- “We have heard learned counsel for the appellant, but find no merit in the present appeals. As per Section 12AA of the Act, an application for registration of the Trust and Institution is required to be made within one year from the date of creation of the Trust or the Establishment of such Institution. The procedure for registration of the Trust or Institution is prescribed under Section 12AA of the Act. In terms of Clause (a) of Section 12AA of the Act, the Commissioner is to satisfy himself about the genuineness of the activities of the Trust on such inquiries as he may deem necessary. Sub-section (1A) and (2) of Section 12AA of the Act, are procedural in nature, whereas Sub-section (3) of Section 12AA of the Act, empowers the Commissioner to cancel the registration of the Trust or Institution, if he is satisfied that the activities of such Trust or Institution are not genuine or are not carried out in accordance with the objects of the Trust or Institution. Section 11 of the Act contemplates that the income as specified therein shall not be included in the total income of the previous year of the person in receipt of the income derived from the property held under the Trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes, whereas Section 12 of the Act, deals with the contributions received by the Trust or an Institution, established for charitable and religious purposes, receiving contribution, shall not be an income in terms
ITA No.187 of 2012 (O & M) ::3:: of Section 11 of the Act. The benefit of Sections 11 and 12 of the Act, are available only if such Trust or Institution is registered under Section 12AA of the Act. On the other hand, Section 10(23C) of the Act are the provisions of the Act in substitution of the earlier provisions of Section 10(22) of the Act as to which income shall not be included in computing the total income of any person. Therefore, the provisions of Sections 11, 12 or Section 10(23C) of the Act, deal with the income of a Trust or of the Institution and the circumstances as to when such income is to be excluded for computing the total income, but the basis of such benefit is the registration under Section 12AA of the Act. Unless a Trust or Institution is registered under Section 12AA of the Act, such Trust or Institution shall not be entitled to exclude from its total income, deductions or contributions or from other sources. Therefore, the principles laid down for excluding the income from consideration under Section 10(22) now 10(23)(C) or Sections 11 and 12 are not applicable while considering the application for registration under Section 12AA of the Act. The application for registration is required to be made within one year of the creation of the Trust. Section 12AA of the Act, requires satisfaction in respect of the genuineness of the activities of the Trust, which includes the activities which the Trust is undertaking at present and also which it may contemplate to undertake. The insertion of sub-section (3) to Section 12AA of the Act, clarifies the said fact, when it empowers the Commissioner to cancel the registration if the activities of the Trust are not carried out in accordance with such objects. Therefore, the object of Section 12AA of the Act, is to examine the genuineness of the objects of the Trust, but not the income of the Trust for charitable or religious purposes. The stage for application of income is yet to arrive i.e. when such Trust or Institution files its
ITA No.187 of 2012 (O & M) ::4:: return. Therefore, we find that the judgments referred to by the learned counsel for the appellant are not applicable to the facts of the present case arising out of the question of registration of the Trust and not of assessment.” 5. In view of the above, no substantial question of law arises for consideration in this appeal. 6. The present appeal is dismissed accordingly.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
JUDGE
(G. S. SANDHAWALIA) October 04, 2012 JUDGE Sukhpreet
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026