THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -1 vs. M/S JAINAM BUILDERS PVT. LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant (Revenue) was fair and reasonable. The Court noted that the new circular dated 17.09.2024, issued under Section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, revises the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court to Rs. 2 Crores. Since the tax liability in the present case was less than Rs. 2 Crores, the Court found it appropriate to dispose of the Tax Case finally in light of the aforesaid circular, specifically paragraph 5 which states that the circular shall apply to SLPs/appeals pending before High Courts and may accordingly be withdrawn. The operative direction was to dispose of the Tax Case finally.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Raipur (the Revenue) against M/s Jainam Builders Pvt. Ltd. (the assessee). The appeal was before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur. The Revenue's counsel submitted that a new circular dated 17.09.2024 was issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, enhancing the monetary limit for filing Income Tax Appeals by the department before the High Court to Rs. 2 Crores. The tax liability in the present case was stated to be less than Rs. 2 Crores. The Revenue requested that the appeal be disposed of in light of this circular. The respondent assessee was not represented.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the present appeal, filed by the Revenue, should be disposed of in light of the new circular dated 17.09.2024 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, which revises the monetary limits for filing appeals before the High Court to Rs. 2 Crores, when the tax effect in the present case is less than this revised limit? (Question of law, concerning the application of CBDT Circulars and Section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961). Contentions: Assessee: No arguments were recorded for the assessee as they were not represented. Revenue: The Revenue contended that a new circular dated 17.09.2024 has been issued by the Ministry of Finance, enhancing the monetary limit for filing Income Tax Appeals before the High Court to Rs. 2 Crores. As the tax liability in the present case is less than this amount, the appeal should be disposed of finally in accordance with this circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 / 4 2024:CGHC:38701-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TAXC No. 26 of 2023 • The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle -1 Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant versus • M/s Jainam Builders Pvt. Ltd. 32, Ashrwad Towers, Near Raj Talkies, G. E. Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (P.A.N.- A.A.B.C.J.4511d.) ... Respondent For Appellant : Mr. Amit Chaudhari and Mr. Vijay Chawla, Advocate. For Respondent : None.
Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Judgment on Board (01.10.2024) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
When the case is taken for hearing and learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance has issued a new circular dated 17.09.2024, in 2 / 4 which monetary limits for filing Income Tax Appeals by the department before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs.2 Crores, whereas in the present case the tax liability of assess is less than Rs.2 Crore. Therefore, in light of aforesaid circular dated 17/09/2024, the present appeal may be disposed of finally.
The said prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.
For ready reference, relevant paragraphs of said circular dated 17/09/2024 is quoted hereinbelow:
“1. Reference is invited to Circular No 5/2024 (F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt))dated15.03.2024 of Central Board of Direct Taxes (the 'Board') vide which monetary limits for filing of income tax appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLP/appeals before Supreme Court have been specified. Further, exceptions to the monetary limits were also specified vide paras 3.1 and 3.2 of the said Circular.
As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of appeals in Income-tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows:- S.No Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (Tax effect in Rs.)
Before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 60 lakh
Before High Court 2 crore
Before Supreme Court 5 crore
3 / 4
Monetary limits given in paragraph 2 above with regard to filing appeal/SLP shall be applicable to all cases including those relating to TDS/TCS under the Income-tax Act, 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the decision to appeal/file SLP shall be taken on merits, without regard to the tax effect and the monetary limits.
It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an appeal.
The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ appeals pending before Supreme Court/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn.
The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.
4 / 4
This issues under section 268A of the Income- tax Act, 1961. 8. Hindi version will follow. ”
In view aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the appellant where monetary limit (tax liability) in the present case is less than Rs.2 Crores therefore, in light of aforesaid circular (Para-5) dated 17/09/2024, the instant Tax Case stands disposed of finally. (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Judge vaishali VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2024.10.01 17:02:40 +0530
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026