THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. GUJARAT CRICKET ASSOCIATION
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the controversy in the present appeal was concluded by its own judgment dated September 27, 2019, passed in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) v. Gujarat Cricket Association, rendered in Tax Appeals No. 268 of 2012 and allied matters. In that prior judgment, the issues were decided in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. Consequently, the High Court found that the present appeal did not give rise to any question of law, much less a substantial question of law, warranting interference. The appeal was therefore dismissed. The reasoning is based on the principle of res judicata or the binding precedent of its own prior decision on identical issues.
What were the facts?
The Revenue, Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order dated March 4, 2019, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench 'D'. The appeal pertains to assessment year 2008-09 and challenges the ITAT's decision regarding exemptions claimed by the assessee, Gujarat Cricket Association. The procedural history involves a prior appeal before the High Court in Tax Appeals No. 268 of 2012 and allied matters, which was decided on September 27, 2019, in favor of the assessee. The Revenue's current appeal proposes three substantial questions of law.
What were the issues?
The Tribunal had to decide three questions of law: 1. Whether the Tribunal was justified in allowing exemptions under Section 11 of the Act on the ground that registration under Section 12AA had been restored, without considering that the issue had not reached finality as the Revenue's appeal was pending before the High Court. 2. Whether the Tribunal was justified in confirming the deletion of additions made in respect of corpus donations under Section 11(1)(d) of the Act, without appreciating that the assessee failed to discharge its onus by not bringing anything on record in support of its claim of corpus donation. 3. Whether the Tribunal was justified in allowing the capital expenditure of Rs. 8,76,56,542 as application of income towards the objects of the trust on the ground that registration under Section 12AA had been restored, without considering that the issue had not reached finality as the Revenue's appeal was pending before the High Court. The Revenue argued that the ITAT's decision on exemptions and capital expenditure was premature as its own appeal was pending. The Revenue also contended that the assessee failed to prove its claim for corpus donations. The judgment does not record specific arguments from the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)
By this appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), the appellant Revenue has challenged the order dated 04.03.2019 made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench ‘D’ in ITA No.2680/Ahd/2011 for assessment year 200809 by proposing the following three questions stated to be substantial questions of law: “[A] Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in allowing the benefit of exemptions u/s.11 of the Act on the ground that registration u/s.12AA had been restored back, without considering that the issue had not reached finality as the C/TAXAP/748/2019 ORDER revenue’s appeal is pending before this Hon’ble Court? [B] Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in confirming the deletion of addition made in respect of corpus donations u/s. 11(1)(d) of the Act without appreciating that the assessee failed to discharge its onus by not bringing anything on record in support of its claim of corpus donation? [C] Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in allowing the capital expenditure of Rs.8,76,56,542/ as application of income towards the objects of the trust on the ground that registration u/s.12AA had been restored back, without considering that the issue had not reached finality as the revenue’s appeal is pending before this Hon’ble Court?”
Heard Mrs. Mauna Bhatt, learned senior standing counsel for the appellant, who has reiterated the grounds set out in the memorandum of appeal.
It is an admitted position that the controversy involved in the present case stands concluded by a judgment dated 27.09.2019 passed by this court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) v. Gujarat Cricket Association rendered in Tax Appeals No.268 of 2012 and allied matters, wherein the issue has C/TAXAP/748/2019 ORDER been decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Under the circumstances, it is not necessary to set out the facts and contentions in detail.
For the reasons recorded in the judgment and order dated 27.09.2019 made in Tax Appeals No.268 of 2012 and allied matters, this appeal does not give rise to any question of law, much less, a substantial question of law, warranting interference. The appeal, therefore, fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. (HARSHA DEVANI, J) (SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J) PRAVIN KARUNAN
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026