THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SHRI SANTOSH JAIN
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant (Revenue) was fair and reasonable. The Court noted that the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs. 2 Crores by the circular dated 17.09.2024. Since the tax liability in the present cases was less than Rs. 2 Crores, and in light of paragraph 5 of the said circular which permits withdrawal of pending appeals, the High Court disposed of both Tax Cases as withdrawn. The Court did not decide the merits of the appeals.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax against Shri Santosh Jain, proprietor of M/s Arihant Mining Co., for Assessment Year 2008-09. The appeals were before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur. The Revenue's counsel submitted that a new circular dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, has enhanced the monetary limit for filing Income Tax Appeals before the High Court to Rs. 2 Crores. The tax liability in the present cases was stated to be less than this enhanced limit. Consequently, the Revenue prayed for the disposal of both appeals in light of this circular.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the appeals filed by the Revenue before the High Court are to be disposed of in light of the new circular dated 17.09.2024 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, which enhances the monetary limit for filing appeals to Rs. 2 Crores, given that the tax effect in the present cases is below this limit? Assessee's Contention: Not recorded. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue contended that a new circular dated 17.09.2024 has been issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, enhancing the monetary limit for filing Income Tax Appeals before the High Court to Rs. 2 Crores. As the tax liability in the present cases is less than Rs. 2 Crores, the appeals may be disposed of finally in light of this circular, specifically referencing paragraph 5 of the circular which states it shall apply to pending appeals and they may be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 / 3
2024:CGHC:40277-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TAXC No. 113 of 2023 1 - The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cirxcle -3(A), Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Appellant versus 1 - Shri Santosh Jain Prop. M/s Arihant Mining Co., Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ( Pan - Acmpj 5971b, A.Y. 2008-09)
---- Respondent TAXC No. 117 of 2023 1 - The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cirxcle-3(1), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Appellant Versus 1 - Shri Santosh Jain Prop. M/s Arihant Mining Co., Raipur (C.G.) (Pan- A C M P J5971 B, A.Y. 2008-09), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate and Mr. Vijay Chawla, Advocate For Respondent : Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, Advocate Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI
2 / 3 Order on Board (15/10/2024) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
When case is taken for hearing and learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance has issued a new circular dated 17.09.2024, in which monetary limits for filing Income Tax Appeals by the department before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs.2 Crores, whereas in the present case the tax liability of assess is less than Rs.2 Crore. Therefore, in light of aforesaid circular dated 17/09/2024, both these appeals may be disposed of finally.
The said prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.
For ready reference, relevant paragraphs of said circular dated 17/09/2024 is quoted hereinbelow :
“1. Reference is invited to Circular No. 5/2024 (F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt))dated15.03.2024
of Central Board of Direct Taxes (the 'Board') vide which monetary limits for filing of income tax appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLP/appeals before Supreme Court have been specified. Further, exceptions to the monetary limits were also specified vide paras 3.1 and 3.2 of the said Circular.
As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of appeals in Income-tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows:- S. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (Tax effect in Rs.)
Before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 60 lakhs
Before High Court 2 crore
Before Supreme Court 5 crore
3 / 3
Monetary limits given in paragraph 2 above with regard to filing appeal/SLP shall be applicable to all cases including those relating to TDS/TCS under the Income-tax Act, 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the decision to appeal/file SLP shall be taken on merits, without regard to the tax effect and the monetary limits.
It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an appeal.
The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ appeals pending before Supreme Court/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn.
The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.
This issues under section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 8. Hindi version will follow. ”
In view aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the appellant where monetary limit (tax liability) in the present cases are less than Rs.2 Crores therefore, in light of aforesaid circular (Para-5) dated 17/09/2024, both these Tax Cases stands disposed of as withdrawn. (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge
Judge Ravi Mandavi
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026