INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD 1(2) vs. M/S CHHATTISGARH SAHAKARI SAKH SAMITI MARYADIT
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant (Revenue) was fair and reasonable. The Court noted that the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs. 2 Crores by the circular dated September 17, 2024. Since the tax liability in the present case is less than Rs. 2 Crores, the Court, in light of paragraph 5 of the aforesaid circular dated September 17, 2024, disposed of the instant Tax Case. The reasoning is based on the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, which also permits withdrawal of pending appeals that fall below the new threshold. The operative direction was to dispose of the Tax Case.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Officer-Ward 1(2), Bhilai (the Appellant) filed a Tax Case before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur. The Respondent is M/s Chhattisgarh Sahakari Sakh Samiti, Bhilai, Durg. The Appellant's counsel submitted that a new circular dated September 17, 2024, issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, enhanced the monetary limit for filing Income Tax Appeals before the High Court to Rs. 2 Crores. The Appellant stated that the tax liability in the present case is less than Rs. 2 Crores. Consequently, the Appellant requested that the present appeal be disposed of in light of this circular. The Respondent was not represented.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the present appeal, where the tax effect is less than Rs. 2 Crores, should be disposed of in light of the CBDT Circular dated September 17, 2024, which enhanced the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court to Rs. 2 Crores? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The Appellant (Revenue) argued that the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs. 2 Crores by the circular dated September 17, 2024. Since the tax liability in the present case is less than this enhanced limit, the appeal may be disposed of finally. The Appellant relied on Circular No. 5/2024 dated March 15, 2024, and the subsequent circular dated September 17, 2024, specifically paragraph 5 thereof, which states that pending appeals may be withdrawn accordingly. Revenue's Contention: None recorded as the Respondent was not represented.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1
2025:CGHC:7269-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TAXC No. 134 of 2024 • Income Tax Officer-Ward 1(2) Bhilai (C.G.)
... Appellant versus • M/s Chhattisgarh Sahakari Sakh Samiti Bhilai, Durg (C.G.).
... Respondent For Appellant : Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate along with Mr. Vijay Chawla, Advocate For Respondent : None. (Division Bench) Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay
Kumar Jaiswal
Order on Board (10.02.2025) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
When case is taken for hearing and learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance has issued a new circular dated 17.09.2024, in which monetary limits for filing Income Tax Appeals by the 2024:CGHC:36953-DB 2 / 4 department before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs.2 Crores, whereas in the present case the tax liability of assess is less than Rs.2 Crore. Therefore, in light of aforesaid circular dated 17/09/2024, the present appeal may be disposed of finally. SOURABH PATEL PATEL Date: 2025.02.12 17:13:56 +0530
2
The said prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.
For ready reference, relevant paragraphs of said circular dated 17/09/2024 is quoted hereinbelow: “1.Reference is invited to Circular No 5/2024 (F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt))dated15.03.2024 of Central Board of Direct Taxes (the 'Board') vide which monetary limits for filing of income tax appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLP/appeals before Supreme Court have been specified. Further, exceptions to the monetary limits were also specified vide paras 3.1 and 3.2 of the said Circular.
As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of appeals in Income-tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows:- S.No . Appeals/SLPs in Income- tax Matters Monetary Limit (Tax effect in Rs.)
Before
Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal 60 Lakh
Before High Court 2 crore Before High Court 2 crore
Before Supreme Court 5 crore 5 crore
Monetary limits given in paragraph 2 above with regard to filing appeal/SLP shall be applicable to all cases including those relating to TDS/TCS under the Income-tax Act, 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the decision to appeal/file SLP shall be taken on merits, without regard to the tax effect and the monetary limits.
3
It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an appeal.
The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ appeals pending before Supreme Court/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn.
The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned. 2024:CGHC:36953-DB 4 / 4
This issues under section 268A of the Incometax Act, 1961. 8. Hindi version will follow.”
In view aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the appellant where monetary limit (tax liability) in the present case is less than Rs.2 Crores therefore, in light of aforesaid circular (Para-5) dated 17/09/2024, the instant Tax Case stands disposed of. (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)
Judge Judge Sourabh P.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026