THE KOTHAKURISSI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, F.NO.1049, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, vs. ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER
What were the facts?
The petitioner, The Kothakurissi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., a Primary Agricultural Credit Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, is challenging an assessment order dated 26.09.2022 for the assessment year 2020-21. The Assessing Officer rejected the petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P, stating there was no evidence that the petitioner satisfied the ingredients of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society as per the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The petitioner has filed an appeal against this assessment order before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the 2nd respondent, arguing that the Supreme Court's judgment in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax governs the situation and renders the assessment incorrect. The High Court considered the writ petition.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala did not decide the merits of the case. Instead, it disposed of the writ petition by directing the Appellate Authority (the 2nd respondent, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)) to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's pending appeal (Ext.P2) expeditiously. The Court also ordered that no coercive steps shall be initiated against the petitioner pursuant to the assessment order (Ext.P1) until the appeal is disposed of. The primary reasoning for this decision was that the petitioner had already preferred an appeal, which was pending before the appellate authority, making it appropriate for that authority to address the issues raised. The judgment does not provide a finding on the validity of the assessment order or the applicability of Section 80P, as these were matters for the appellate authority to decide.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the assessment order dated 26.09.2022, which rejected the petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is valid, considering the petitioner's status as a Primary Agricultural Credit Society. Assessee's Contentions: The petitioner contends that the assessment order is incorrect because the Supreme Court's judgment in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax governs the field. This judgment, it is argued, supports the petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P. Revenue's Contentions: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the revenue in response to the writ petition. The assessment order itself rejected the deduction on the ground that the petitioner did not satisfy the ingredients of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THUR AY, THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 29TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 1729 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: THE KOTHAKURISSI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, F.NO.1049, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GEETHA A. AGED 54 YEARS PANAMANNA, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD, PIN - 679501 BY ADV ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV RESPONDENT/S: 1 ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER ASSESSMENT UNIT, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO.401, E- RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110003 2 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110003 ADV. JOSE JOSEPH (SC) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 1729 OF 2023 2 JUDGMENT Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. Ext.P1 order of assessment was issued against the petitioner on 26.09.2022, fo
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Suvarnakarara Co-Operative Society Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2, KarwarITA 210/PAN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Suvarnakarara Co-Operative Society Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2, KarawarITA 209/PAN/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Suvarnakarara Co-Operative Society Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2, KarwarITA 208/PAN/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- SHI vs Phurti Gramin Bigarsheti Sahakari…ITA 893/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Heard6 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026