COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SARASPUR MILLS LIMITED

ITR/70/1984HC GujaratGJHC24011744198405 February 1997Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BALIA2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

This case involves an Income Tax Reference filed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Revenue) against Saraspur Mills Limited (Assessee) before the High Court of Gujarat. The reference arises from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad. The core issue concerns the allowability of extra shift allowance on exhaust fans. The Revenue's contention is that such allowance is not permissible as per Item III(iv) of Appendix I of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, which specifically excludes fan installation from extra shift allowance. The Tribunal had previously allowed this allowance. The High Court is being asked to decide on the correctness of the Tribunal's decision.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the Tribunal was not right in law in allowing extra shift allowance on exhaust fans. The Court's reasoning is based on a prior identical decision rendered on the same day in CIT Vs. Saraspur Mills Ltd. - I.T.R No.27 of 1984. In that case, the Court had held that no extra shift allowance was allowable on exhaust fans due to the specific exclusion of fan installation from extra shift allowance under Item III(iv) of Appendix I of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. For the same reasons articulated in the previous judgment, the High Court found that the Tribunal had erred in allowing the extra shift allowance. The ratio decidendi is that specific exclusions in the Income Tax Rules must be adhered to, and fan installations are explicitly excluded from extra shift allowance. The question referred to the Court is answered in the negative, in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in allowing extra shift allowance on exhaust fans, notwithstanding the fact that item III(iv) of Appendix I of the I.T. Rules, 1962, specifying rates of depreciation, specifically excluded fan installation from extra shift allowance? (Question of law) Assessee's Contentions: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the assessee before the High Court. However, the fact that the Tribunal allowed the extra shift allowance implies the assessee argued for its allowability. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue contended that extra shift allowance on exhaust fans is not allowable. This contention is based on Item III(iv) of Appendix I of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, which explicitly excludes fan installation from the benefit of extra shift allowance. The Revenue relies on this specific exclusion in the Rules.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 256(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 70 of 1984

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3.

Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 256(1)

All 370 judgments and leading authorities on Section 256(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →