SAHARA INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 8(2), KOLKATA , KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the business is considered 'set up' when the assessee acquires the necessary wherewithal and physical infrastructure, even if awaiting commencement. Expenses incurred after setting up but before commencement are deductible. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the benefit of expenses as claimed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Sahara India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd, acquired a cruise ship to run a floating hotel in Goa. Expenses were incurred for acquiring and renovating the ship, and for its operations before the business commenced. The Assessing Officer disallowed these expenses on the grounds that the business had not started.
What were the issues?
Whether expenses incurred prior to the commencement of business, but after acquiring the necessary infrastructure, are allowable as a deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
Per George Mathan, JM : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-3, Kolkata, dated 29.12.2017 for the assessment year 2014-2015. 2. None represented on behalf of the assessee. Shri Abhijit Adhikary, Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the revenue.
It was submitted by the ld. Sr. DR that the appeal has been filed by the assessee and as nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee, the order of the ld. CIT(A) is liable to be confirmed. It was the further submission that in para 4 of the assessment order, the ld. Assessing Offic
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 37
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company…ITA 933/AHD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company…ITA 932/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company…ITA 931/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company… vs The ACIT, Circle-2(1)(1), VadodaraITA 768/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026