THE AZHIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/14/2014HC KeralaKLHC01026580201416 February 2016Author: HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN,HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN5 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What were the facts?

The assessee, Azhikode Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., is challenging an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cochin Bench, dated May 24, 2013. The ITAT's order was in appeal against an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Kozhikode, which in turn was against the assessment order dated December 21, 2011, for Assessment Year 2009-10, issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-I, Kannur. The appeals before the High Court are a batch of matters, including ITA No. 14 of 2014, which are interlinked with issues decided in ITA No. 212 of 2013 and connected cases. The core dispute revolves around the assessee's eligibility for exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the treatment of provisions for bad and doubtful debts.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court decided that substantial questions of law (A), (B), and (C) were answered in ITA No. 212 of 2013 and connected cases, with the judgment in that case to be appended. The Court remitted all the matters for reconsideration by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in light of the answers rendered on substantial questions of law (A), (B), and (C). The Tribunal is to thereupon consider the issues relating to bad and doubtful debts and the assessee's claim in that regard. The Court also directed that in all cases where exemptions are claimed under Section 80P and such matters were pending before the assessing or appellate authority, including in these appeals, the question of exemption available under Section 80P was still available for decision. The specific findings on each question (A), (B), (C), and (D) are not detailed in this judgment itself, but are referred to as having been decided in a prior connected case, and the matters are remanded for fresh consideration by the Tribunal.

What were the issues?

The Tribunal had to decide the following substantial questions of law: 1. (A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law in deciding against the assessee the issue regarding entitlement for exemption under Section 80P, ignoring the fact that the assessee is a primary agricultural credit society? 2. (B) Whether the Tribunal is justified in denying the exemption under Section 80P on the mere ground of belated filing of return by the assessee? 3. (C) Whether a return filed by the assessee beyond the period stipulated under Section 139(1)/(4) or Section 142(1)/148 can be held as non est in law and invalid for the purpose of deciding exemption under Section 80P? 4. (D) Whether the Tribunal is correct in law or is justified in restricting the provisions for bad and doubtful debt at 7.5% of the gross total income, on the reason that the assessee is not entitled for the status of rural branch to claim 10% of the aggregate average advances as bad and doubtful debt, under Section 36(1)(viia)? The assessee contended that it is a primary agricultural credit society and thus entitled to Section 80P exemption. The revenue's contentions are not explicitly detailed for each issue but are implied through the Tribunal's adverse findings. The judgment does not explicitly record arguments for the revenue on each specific point, but it is clear they opposed the assessee's claims.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P,Section 139,Section 142,Section 148,Section 36(1)(viia)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN TUE AY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/27TH MAGHA, 1937 ITA.No. 14 of 2014 () ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 326/2012 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 24-05-2013 APPELLANT(S): ------------ THE AZHIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., AZHIKODE KANNUR - 670 009, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

BY ADVS.SRI.N.J.MATHEWS SRI.V.RAMKUMAR NAMBIAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------- INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - I, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KANNUR - 670 006. R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ALONG WITH ITA.No.3 of 2015 AND CONNECTED CASES ON 16-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ITA.No. 14 of 2014 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE-A: COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 21.12.2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE-B: COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER DATED 21.9.12 ISSUED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-II, KOZHIKODE. ANNEXURE-C: COPY OF ORDER IN ITA.326/COCH/2012, DATED 24.5.

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 80P

All 4,983 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →