THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, can only be made from the assessment year 2007-2008 onwards. This finding is based on the Supreme Court's decision in Commissioner of Income Tax v. ESSAR Teleholdings [(2018) 401 ITR 445 (SC)]. Consequently, for the assessment year 2003-2004, which precedes the applicability of Section 14A as per the Supreme Court ruling, any disallowance made under this section must be set aside. The High Court upheld the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which had presumably also taken this view. The question is answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. No specific issue was left undecided.
What were the facts?
This appeal concerns assessment year 2003-2004. The Revenue, represented by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Thrissur, is the appellant, and M/s. The Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd., Thrissur, is the respondent assessee. The dispute pertains to a disallowance made under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The order under challenge is an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, dated August 20, 2007, which had presumably ruled in favour of the assessee. The High Court of Kerala is hearing the appeal against the Tribunal's order.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is applicable for the assessment year 2003-2004? The Revenue contends that the disallowance under Section 14A is valid for the assessment year in question. The Assessee, through its successful appeal before the Tribunal, argued that the disallowance under Section 14A was not applicable for the assessment year 2003-2004. The High Court relies on the Supreme Court decision in Commissioner of Income Tax v. ESSAR Teleholdings [(2018) 401 ITR 445 (SC)] to address this issue. The judgment does not record specific arguments from the Revenue beyond the implication of their appeal, nor does it detail the Assessee's specific arguments before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT
The appeal arises from the assessment year 2003-2004 and the question raised is on the disallowance made under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. ESSAR Teleholdings [(2018) 401 ITR 445 (SC)] held that Section 14A disallowance can be made only from the assessment year 2007-2008. The present appeal arises from a prior year and the disallowance had to be set aside. We uphold the order of the Tribunal. The question stands answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The appeal stands rejected. K.VINOD CHANDRAN sp/11/12/18 JUDGE ASHOK MENON JUDGE //// P.A. TO JUDGE
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-AOF THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER U/S. 143(3) DATED 15/12/2005. ANNEXURE-BOF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) IN ITA NO.67/R.I./ TCR/CIT-V/05-06 DATED 17/03/2006. ANNEXURE-COF THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN ITA 336(COCH)/2006 DATED 20/08/2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL //// P.A. TO JUDGE
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026