COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX vs. ANAND FAMILY TRUST

WTR/114/1994HC GujaratGJHC24020539199429 January 1998Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE2 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench 'B', referred a question of law to the High Court of Gujarat under Section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The assessee is Anand Family Trust, and the revenue is the Commissioner of Wealth Tax. The assessment year is not explicitly stated. The dispute concerns the assessment of the assessee under Section 21(4) of the Wealth-tax Act. The High Court noted that the facts are similar to another case, Wealth Tax Reference No. 43/93, which was decided on the same day.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court answered the referred question in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The reasoning followed the judgement and order delivered in a similar case, Wealth Tax Reference No. 43/93. The principle established is that for wealth tax assessment under Section 21(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, the wealth tax is leviable on the aggregate value of life interest and reversionary interest only if this aggregate value exceeds the taxable limit prescribed in the wealth-tax rate schedule for the relevant year. The High Court disposed of the reference accordingly, with no order as to costs.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that in the assessment of the assessee under Sec. 21(4) of the Wealth-tax Act the wealth tax was leviable on the aggregate value of life interest and reversionary interest only if such interest exceeded the taxable limit prescribed in the wealth-tax rate schedule of the relevant year by following the judgement in the case of Haresh Anitha Trust, 173 ITR 103? (Question of law). The assessee's contention is implied by the Tribunal's decision in its favour. The revenue's contention is that the Tribunal was not right in law in holding as it did, implying they argued for the levy of wealth tax on the aggregate value of interests irrespective of the taxable limit. The Tribunal's decision was based on the precedent of Haresh Anitha Trust, 173 ITR 103.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 27(1),Section 21(4)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

WEALTH TAX REFERENCE No 114 of 1994

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3.

Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 27(1)

All 322 judgments and leading authorities on Section 27(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →