COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. INDU NISSAN OXO CHEMICALS LTD.

ITR/51/1987HC GujaratGJHC24011784198719 July 2001Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA2 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench 'C', referred a question of law to the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad at the instance of the revenue. The assessee is Indu Nissan Oxo Chemicals Ltd. The assessment year(s) are not explicitly stated. The order or action under challenge is the Tribunal's decision to refer the question. The amount in dispute is Rs. 2,57,312, which represents interest income. The procedural history involves a reference application under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the revenue. The High Court heard the matter, with the revenue represented by counsel and the assessee served but unrepresented.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court answered the question in the affirmative, in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. The Court's reasoning was based on the law laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, 227 ITR 172. The ratio decidendi is that interest income earned by a company, even before the commencement of its business operations, is taxable. The operative direction was to dispose of the reference accordingly, with no order as to costs. No issue was expressly left undecided.

What were the issues?

1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the interest income of Rs. 2,57,312 was taxable? This is a question of law. The revenue contended that the interest income earned by the assessee company before the commencement of its business is taxable. The assessee's contentions are not recorded as nobody appeared for them. The issue turns on the interpretation of provisions related to the taxation of income earned prior to business commencement, implicitly referencing sections like Section 2(1A) or general charging sections.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 256(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 51 of 1987

For Approval and Signature:

Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA

============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?

4.

Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?

5.

Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -----

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 256(1)

All 370 judgments and leading authorities on Section 256(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →