COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. vs. JAGDISHBHAI P. BHAGAT
What were the facts?
This case involves an Income Tax Application filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (the Revenue) against Jagdishbhai P. Bhagat (the assessee). The application was made under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking a reference to the High Court on a question of law arising from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The High Court heard the learned counsel for the applicant. The ITAT had previously rejected an application filed under Section 256(1) of the Act. The High Court's decision was made on January 24, 2003.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that there was no question of law arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court found the reasons given by the Tribunal for rejecting the application under Section 256(1) to be cogent. Consequently, the High Court rejected the application filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax. The rule issued in connection with the application was discharged without any order as to costs. The ratio of this decision is that if the Tribunal's reasons for refusing a reference are found to be cogent by the High Court, the application for reference will be rejected.
What were the issues?
1. Whether a substantial question of law arises from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the purpose of reference to the High Court under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue contended that there was a question of law that warranted a reference. The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the assessee. The Tribunal had previously rejected the application under Section 256(1), implying that it found no such question of law to be arising from its order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX APPLICATION No 387 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement?
Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : N
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 256(1)
- Sahara India Tourism Development Corpn… vs ACIT, Circle - 8(2), KolkataITA 357/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Nov 2025AY 2014-15
- Samir Narain Bhojwani, Mumbai vs DCIT 4(2)(1), MumbaiITA 260/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed25 Apr 2025AY 2018-19
- ACIT, Central Circle- 28, New Delhi vs Yogender Mohan Rustagi, New DelhiITA 8270/DEL/2019[2017-18]Status: Disposed10 Jan 2024AY 2017-18
- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1… vs M/S. Canton Vinimay Pvt LtdITAT/125/202113 Dec 2021
- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1… vs M/S Sagar Fintrade Pvt. Ltd.(Now Merged…ITAT/126/202113 Dec 2021
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smti Gollo Sarah vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 8 Oct 2026
- Abhiram Ayodhyanath Swami vs. Union Of INDIA, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 8 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Balaram Halder vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026