COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX vs. HALLIBURTON OFF SHARE SERVICES

ITA/90/2000HC UttarakhandUKHC01025124200330 June 2004Author: OTHER5 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What were the facts?

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning Assessment Year 1991-92. The respondent, Mr. Wilkin C., a non-resident foreign technician employed by Halliburton Offshore Services Inc., worked in India under a contract with alternating "on periods" and "off periods." During "on periods," he was provided free boarding and lodging. The dispute centers on whether salary paid for the "off periods" outside India was taxable in India and whether interest under Section 234B was leviable. The ITAT had ruled in favor of the assessee on both counts, leading to the present appeal by the Revenue.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court addressed two questions. Regarding the first question, concerning the taxability of salary for the "off period," the Court held in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The Court reasoned that the contract's "on" and "off" periods were integral parts of a single scheme, and the "off period" involved training and maintaining fitness for hazardous work on oil rigs in India, thus having a nexus with services rendered in India. The payment for this period was therefore considered income earned in India under Section 9(1)(ii). The Court noted that the employer's conduct of paying the entire salary from Indian operations supported this view. For the second question, regarding interest under Section 234B, the Court held in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court found that Section 234B interest is compensatory, but in this case, there was a bonafide dispute and conflicting Tribunal decisions at the time, making the imposition of interest without hearing and reasons unjustified. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances, the ITAT was legally correct in holding that salary paid to the assessee for the "off period" outside India was not chargeable to Indian Income Tax under Section 9(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? - Assessee's Contention: Not recorded. - Revenue's Contention: Not recorded. 2. Whether, on the facts and circumstances, the ITAT was legally correct in holding that no interest could be charged under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, despite the Assessing Officer charging it based on the definition of assessed tax in Explanation I to Section 234B? - Assessee's Contention: Not recorded. - Revenue's Contention: Not recorded.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 9(1)(ii),Section 234B,Section 4,Section 5(2),Section 2(45),Section 191,Section 192,Section 208,Section 209(1)(a),Section 209(1)(d)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Assessment Year 1991-92

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

Income Tax Appeal No. 53 of 2001 (Old No. 90/2000)

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut & another …………….. Appellants

Versus

Halliburton Offshore Services inc., As agent of Mr. Wilkin C, F. Cuffe Parade, Bombay ………. Respondent

Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for appellants.

Date: 30.06.2004

Hon'ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon'ble P.C. Pant, J.

1.

This is an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed by the Revenue against the judgment and order dated 29.09.1999 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in I.T.A. No. 4309/D/1993. 2. Mr. Wilkin C., respondent is a non-resident foreign technician employed by a foreign company, Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. The respondent was required to work for a fixed number of days after which he is recalled by the employer for equal number of days called "on period" and "off period" respectively. During the on period, respondent was provided free boarding and lodging at the site.

3.

The questions raised before us are as follows

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 9(1)(ii)

All 117 judgments and leading authorities on Section 9(1)(ii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →