COMMISSIONER OF IINCOME TAX vs. READING and BATES EXPLORATION

ITA/29/2002HC UttarakhandUKHC01002821200420 July 2004Author: OTHER6 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What were the facts?

The appeal by the Revenue challenges the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 1992-93. The assessee, Mr. H. Buttner, a non-resident foreign technician employed by Reading and Bates Exploration Company, derived income from salaries. The company executed contracts in India during the relevant year. The ITAT had previously ruled on similar issues in other cases. The dispute concerns the taxability of salary paid for 'off periods' outside India, the taxability of free boarding facilities, and the charging of interest under Section 234B.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that salary paid for the 'off period' outside India is taxable in India. The court reasoned that the 'on' and 'off' periods form an integral part of the contract, and the 'off' period, even if considered a standby arrangement or rest period, involved training directly connected with services rendered in India, making the assessee mentally and physically fit for hazardous work. The payment for the 'off' period was thus considered income earned in India under Section 9(1)(ii). Regarding free boarding, the court held it was a necessity due to the hazardous and continuous nature of work on the rig, not a luxury or perquisite, and its value could not be added to the assessee's income. For interest under Section 234B, the court found it was compensatory and that due to conflicting Tribunal decisions at the time, a bona fide dispute existed, making the imposition of interest unjustified without hearing and reasons, thus favouring the assessee.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances, the ITAT was legally correct in holding that salary paid to the assessee for the off period outside India was not chargeable to Indian Income Tax under Section 9(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite previous ITAT rulings to the contrary? The Revenue argued that the ITAT's previous decisions held off-period salary as taxable in India. 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances, the ITAT was legally correct in holding that free boarding facilities provided by the employer at the rig in high seas cannot be construed as a perquisite? The Revenue's contention is not explicitly recorded. 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances, the ITAT was justified in law in allowing the appeal of the assessee on the issue of charging interest under Section 234B, while admitting that charging of interest under Section 234B is consequential? The assessee's contention is not explicitly recorded.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 9(1)(ii),Section 4,Section 5(2),Section 2(45),Section 234B,Section 191,Section 192,Section 208,Section 209(1)(a),Section 209(1)(d)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

2004:UHC:2054

Assessment Year 1992-93

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

Income Tax Appeal No. 29 of 2002

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun and another

............. Appellants

Versus

Reading & Bates Exploration Co., As agent of Mr. H. Buttner, C/o Arthur Anderson & Co., 426, World Trade Centre, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi ...............Respondent

Mr. S.K. Posti, learned counsel for the Tax Department. Ms. Krishi Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent.

Date: 20.07.2004

Hon'ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon'ble P.C. Pant, J.

1.

This is an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed by the Revenue against the judgment and order dated 23.02.2001 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in I.T.A. Nos. 7446/Del/1995. 2. Mr. H. Buttner, respondent is a non-resident foreign technician employed by a foreign company, Reading and Bates Exploration Company which, in the year under consideration, executed contracts in India. During the year consideration, respondent was in employment of this company and thus derived income from 'salaries' from it.

3.

T

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 9(1)(ii)

All 117 judgments and leading authorities on Section 9(1)(ii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →