BARKHA INVESTMENTS & TRADING CO vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITR/266/1993HC GujaratGJHC24021293199312 July 2005Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA,HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What were the facts?

The assessee, Barkha Investments & Trading Co., is challenging an order related to Assessment Year 1983-84. The revenue has referred a question of law to the High Court. The dispute revolves around whether the assessee company qualifies as a financial or investment company under Section 40A(8)(c)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which would impact the disallowance of interest paid on deposits. The High Court notes that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had previously decided a similar issue for Assessment Year 1982-83 in the assessee's own case (Income Tax Reference No. 52 of 1993). It is common ground that the judgment in the earlier reference would govern the present one.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court, following its own judgment in the assessee's case for Assessment Year 1982-83 (Income Tax Reference No. 52 of 1993), held that the Tribunal had erred in law by not considering the assessee as a "financial company" under Section 40A(8)(c) of the Act. However, the Court also noted that certain documentation produced by the assessee pertained to a period prior to the relevant accounting period. Therefore, to definitively determine if any interest disallowance under Section 40A(8) was required for the year under consideration, the assessee was granted an opportunity to submit relevant details, including a certificate from the RBI for the period. The Tribunal was also permitted to examine the nature of the assessee's transactions, particularly regarding the acquisition and holding of shares and securities, and whether they were transferred in the assessee's name before being dealt with. The reference was disposed of with these directions.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee company was a financial company or investment company under sub-clause (ii) of clause (c) of the explanation to sub-section (8) of Section 40A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and therefore, no disallowance is to be made under the said sub-section from its expenditure by way of interest paid on deposits? Assessee's Contention: Not explicitly recorded, but impliedly argues that it is a financial/investment company and no disallowance should be made. Revenue's Contention: Not explicitly recorded, but impliedly argues that the assessee is not a financial/investment company and disallowance is warranted.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 40A(8),Section 256(1),Section 260(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 266 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI ============================================================ 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================ BARKHA INVESTMENTS & TRADING CO - Applicant(s)

Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Respondent(s) =========================================================== Appearance : MR MANISH J.SHAH FOR MR JP SHAH for Petitioner No(s).: 1. MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No(s).: 1. ============================================================== CORAM :HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI Date : 12/07/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) 1 The following question

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 256(1)

All 370 judgments and leading authorities on Section 256(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →