COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BISLERI BEWERAGES PVT.LTD.

ITR/240/1994HC GujaratGJHC24020316199423 November 2005Author: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA,HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI5 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What were the facts?

This case involves an Income Tax Reference filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat-I, Ahmedabad, against Bisleri Beverages Pvt. Ltd. for the Assessment Year 1984-85, corresponding to the accounting period of the calendar year 1983. The reference was made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'A', at the instance of the revenue. The core of the dispute revolves around two specific disallowances made by the revenue authorities and subsequently adjudicated by the Tribunal. The revenue is challenging the Tribunal's findings on these two points.

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court addressed two distinct issues. Firstly, concerning motor car repair expenses of Rs.61,264/-, the Court held that the Tribunal was not justified in excluding these expenses from Section 37(3A) of the Act. This decision was based on the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Britannia Industries Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax (2005) 278 ITR 546. The question was answered in the negative, favoring the revenue. Secondly, regarding the weighted deduction under Section 35B for commission paid to foreign agents on export sales, the Court acknowledged that this issue was concluded in favor of the assessee by a previous decision of the same High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Cadila Laboratories (P.) Ltd. (1996) 221 ITR 35. Therefore, the Tribunal was held to be right in law and facts, and the question was answered in the affirmative, favoring the assessee. The reference was disposed of accordingly.

What were the issues?

The Tribunal was asked to decide two questions of law: 1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that motor car repair expenses amounting to Rs.61,264/- should not be included under section 37(3A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 2. Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that the assessee is entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B in respect of commission paid to foreign agents on export sales? Assessee's Contentions: The judgment does not explicitly record the assessee's contentions for either issue. The assessee was represented by Mr. M.J. Shah. Revenue's Contentions: For the first issue, the revenue, represented by Mr. M.R. Bhatt, argued that the motor car repair expenses should be included under Section 37(3A). For the second issue, the revenue did not present arguments as the issue was considered concluded by a High Court decision.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 37(3A),Section 35B,Section 256(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

ITR/240/1994 1/5 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 240 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI ================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ================================================ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Applicant(s) Versus BISLERI BEWERAGES PVT.LTD. - Respondent(s) ================================================= Appearance : MR MANISH R BHATT for Applicant(s) : 1, SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Respondent(s) : 1, =================================================

ITR/240/1994 2/5 JUDGMENT CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA and HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI Date : 23/11/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI) 1 The Income Tax Appell

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 256(1)

All 370 judgments and leading authorities on Section 256(1) →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →