MAPAEX REMEDIES LLP,PLOT NO 6A, INDUSTRIAL AREA vs. CIRCLE 4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD

ITA 1074/AHD/2026Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad06 October 2026AY 2020-215 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the legal ground regarding the reopening of the assessment. It held that the notice under Section 147 was issued within three years from the end of the relevant assessment year. Furthermore, under the amended provisions of Section 147 effective from April 1, 2021, the AO is empowered to initiate reassessment proceedings if escapement of income comes to his notice. The Tribunal found that the facts of the cases relied upon by the assessee (P.C. Snehal Engineers and Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd.) were distinguishable as those reopenings were done beyond four years, requiring different conditions to be met. Regarding the merits of the addition, the Tribunal respectfully followed the Gujarat High Court's decision in Gujarat Flurochemicals Ltd. (supra), which held that disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot exceed the exempt income. Therefore, the AO was directed to restrict the disallowance to the extent of the exempt income of Rs. 1,66,349. The ground taken by the assessee on merits was partly allowed.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Mapaex Remedies LLP, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2020-21 on February 13, 2021, declaring a total income of Rs. 10,84,96,790. The original assessment under Section 143(3) was completed on September 21, 2022, accepting the returned income. Subsequently, reassessment proceedings under Section 147 were initiated on the grounds that a disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was not made concerning the assessee's exempt dividend income of Rs. 1,66,349. The reassessment was completed on February 28, 2025, under Section 147 read with Section 144B, determining a total income of Rs. 11,12,35,119, with an addition of Rs. 27,38,329 under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The assessee's appeal to the CIT(A) was dismissed. The assessee is now in appeal before the ITAT.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was legal and valid, considering the issue of disallowance under Section 14A was already examined during the original assessment. Assessee's contention: The reopening was incorrect as the AO had already examined the issue of disallowance under Section 14A during the original assessment and the assessee had provided a specific reply stating no expenditure was incurred for exempt income. Reliance was placed on Gujarat High Court decisions in P.C. Snehal Engineers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT and Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd. Vs DICT. Revenue's contention: The amended provisions of Section 147, effective from April 1, 2021, empower the AO to reopen if income has escaped assessment and such issue comes to notice subsequently. The AO's action was supported. 2. Whether the addition of Rs. 27,38,329 made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D was justified, and if not, whether it should be restricted to the extent of exempt income. Assessee's contention: No disallowance under Section 14A should have been made as no expenditure was directly or indirectly incurred for earning dividend income. Furthermore, any disallowance could not exceed the exempt income of Rs. 1,66,349. Reliance was placed on PCIT Vs. Gujarat Flurochemicals Ltd. (Guj.).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A,Section 8D,Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 144B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA & SHRI SANJAY KUMAR

For Appellant: Shri Gagan Tiwari, AR
For Respondent: Shri Amit Pratap Singh, SR-DR
Hearing: 10.09.2026Pronounced: 06.10.2026

PER NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] dated 25.02.2026 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2020-21 in the proceeding u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred as “the Act”].

2.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee had filed its return of income on 13.02.2021 declaring total income of Rs.10,84,96,790/-. The original assessment was completed u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 21.09.2022 accepting the return of the income. Thereafter, re-assessment proceeding u/s. 147 of the Act was initiated on the ground that di

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →