SHRI BAWA LAL JI MAHARAJ CHARITABLE SOCIETY,DHIANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-( EXEMPTION), AMRITSAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the matter should be restored to the file of the CIT(E) for a fresh examination. The reasoning was that subsequent to the rejection order, the CIT(E) had granted registration to the assessee under Section 12AB of the Act after examining the requisite documents. Therefore, the observations in the impugned order regarding the genuineness of the assessee's activities needed reconsideration in light of the Section 12AB registration. The Tribunal also noted that the objection regarding the absence of a dissolution clause required fresh examination, as the assessee stated the trust deed was amended to incorporate such a clause. These subsequent developments directly impacted the grounds for declining 80G approval. The CIT(E) was directed to examine the application afresh, considering the Section 12AB registration and the amended trust deed, and also to examine the objection regarding alleged benefit to another person/entity. The assessee was to be given an opportunity to furnish the amended trust deed and other required documents. The operative direction was to set aside the impugned order and restore the application to the CIT(E). No issue was expressly left undecided.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Shri Bawa Lal Ji Maharaj, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) [CIT(E)], Chandigarh. The assessment year in question is 2026-27. The CIT(E) rejected the assessee's application for approval under Section 80G(5)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, citing that the assessee was engaged in religious activities, despite the application mentioning charitable activities. The assessee contended that the rejection was contradictory as they had already been granted registration under Section 12AB(1)(b) and had received 80G approval previously for the same objects. The amount in dispute is not explicitly stated. The procedural history involves the rejection of the 80G application by the CIT(E) and the subsequent appeal to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the learned CIT(Exemptions) erred in rejecting the application for approval under Section 80G(5)(ii) solely on the ground that the application form 10AB mentioned 'religious cum charitable' activities, without appreciating that the trust is engaged in charitable activities such as running a hospital, medical relief, relief to the poor, and social welfare. (Question of law and fact, relying on Section 80G(5)(ii) and Explanation 3 of the Income-tax Act). Assessee's contentions: - The rejection is contradictory and arbitrary, especially since registration under Section 12AB(1)(b) was granted after examining the genuineness of charitable activities. - The trust has been granted approval under Section 80G on earlier occasions based on the same Memorandum of Association and objects, with no material change. - The activities are genuine religious cum charitable activities, including langar, relief to the poor, and welfare activities. Revenue's contentions: - The judgment records no specific contentions for the revenue regarding this issue, other than the CIT(E)'s initial rejection order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80G,Section 80G(5)(ii),Section 12AB,Section 12AB(1)(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: SH. SAKTIJIT DEY, HON’BLE & SH. GIRISH AGRAWAL, HON’BLE
Per: GIRISH AGRAWAL, AM:
This appeal is in respect of rejection of application made by the assessee seeking approval u/s 80G(5)(ii) filed in Form 10AB. According to the ld. CIT(E), the assessee is engaged in the religious activities though in Form 10AB the assessee has mentioned the nature of activities being charitable.
The ld. CIT(E) concluded that assessee is engaged in religious activities and though rejected the application made for seeking approval u/s 80G. 2 Assessment Year: 2026-27
1 That the learned CIT (Exemptions) has rejecting the application for approval under section 80G (5) solely on the ground that in application form 10AB nat
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026