THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY vs. SMT. KASTURBAI WALCHAND TRUST, BOMBAY

CIVIL APPEAL No. 180/1966Supreme Court[1967] 2 S.C.R. 731 October 1966Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: J.C. SHAH, V. RAMASWAMI, VISHISHTHA BHARGAVA THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME7 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Tribunal held that the income from the trust properties after July 21, 1955, was exempt from tax under Section 4(3)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1922. The Court reasoned that once the respondent validly renounced her interest through the deed of surrender, which was permissible under Section 58 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, the trust properties were held by the trustees solely for the charitable purposes outlined in Clause 8. Even if Clause 8's application of income for charitable purposes was restricted until the respondent's death, the income accruing after the surrender would either be applied for charitable purposes or accumulate for such purposes, both of which are exempt under Section 4(3)(i). The Court noted that the question of whether Clause 8 came into operation immediately after the surrender was unnecessary for deciding the exemption, as the second part of Section 4(3)(i) concerning accumulation for charitable purposes would apply. The appeals were dismissed.

What were the facts?

The respondent, Smf. Kasturbai Walchand Trust, Bombay, and her husband created a trust in November 1946. Clause 7 of the trust deed stipulated that the income from trust properties was to be paid to the respondent during her lifetime. Clause 8 directed the trustees to apply the income for specified charitable purposes after the respondent's death. On July 21, 1955, the respondent executed a deed of surrender, relinquishing her beneficial interest in the trust income so that it could be utilized for charitable purposes. For assessment years 1956-57 to 1959-60, the trust claimed exemption under Section 4(3)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, arguing the properties were held wholly for charitable purposes. The Income Tax Officer rejected this, viewing the surrender as a transfer of income. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal upheld the trust's claim, as did the High Court on reference.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the trust properties were held wholly for charitable purposes, making their income exempt under Section 4(3)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, following the respondent's deed of surrender on July 21, 1955? Assessee's contention: The deed of surrender validly renounced the respondent's beneficial interest, thereby vesting the properties entirely for charitable purposes as per the trust deed, entitling the income to exemption under Section 4(3)(i). The respondent relied on Section 58 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882. Revenue's contention: The deed of surrender did not amount to a renouncement of rights but a transfer of income received by the respondent for the trust's use. Furthermore, Clause 8 of the trust deed, which specified charitable application "from and after the death" of the respondent, prevented the trustees from applying income for charitable purposes during her lifetime, thus precluding exemption under Section 4(3)(i).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 4(3)(i),Section 58,Section 41(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

A THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY v. SMf. KASTURBAI WALCHAND TRUST, BOMBAY October 31, 1966 B [J. C. SHAH, V. RAMAsWAMI AND V. BHARGAVA, JJ.) c D E F G H Income Tw: Act 1922, s. 4(3) (i)-Income of trust property-payable to beneficiary during htr lifetime-Thereafter for specified charitable pur- poses-Beneficiary executing surrender of beneficial interest-Thereafler whether trust property held wholly for charitable purposes and exempt from 'IGX-Whether Income of trust property receivable by beneficiary or 1ry 111111 on behalf of beneficiary.

By a deed executed in November 1946, the respondent and her bus· band created a trust in respe1:t of their properties. In accordance wilh Cause 7 of the deed, the income of the trust properties was to be paid to the respondent during her lifetime and, by Clause 8 the trustees were directed to apply the income, from and after the death of the respondent, . to (lertaln cbantable purposes enumerated in the deed. On July 21, 19SS, 'Ille respondent executed a deed of surrender whereby she gave up her beneficial interest in the income of the trust so that 1t may immediately vest in the trustees and may be utilised fo

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 58

All 48 judgments and leading authorities on Section 58 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →