Section 58 of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.94

Section 58 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 94 (Amounts not deductible) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 94 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 58 is Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit v. Income Tax Officer (138 Taxmann.com 476), cited in 24 of the 48 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 58

Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit v. Income Tax Officer
138 Taxmann.com 476 · 2022 · ITAT
24
citing judgments

Interest earned by a cooperative society from deposits with cooperative banks and nationalized banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act. Such interest is considered attributable to the business of the cooperative society, especially when deposits are statutorily required.

Virmati Ramkrishna v. CIT
131 ITR 659 · 1981 · High Court
21
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred for the purpose of making or earning income from 'other sources' is deductible if there is a nexus between the expenditure and the income earned. The expenditure must be linked to the income earned, not just the activity that generates the income.

CIT v. Krishak Sahkari Ganna Samiti Limited
258 ITR 594 · 2002 · High Court
13
citing judgments

Interest earned by a cooperative society on fixed deposits with a bank or co-operative society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(iii) if it is directly linked to and attributable to the society's primary activity of marketing agricultural produce grown by its members.

CIT vs. Krishak Sahkari Ganna Samiti Limited 258 ITR 594 (Alld)and CIT v. Cooperative Cane Development Union Limited
118 ITR 770 · 1979 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Interest earned by co-operative societies on fixed deposits with banks and other co-operative societies is includible in their total income, unless it falls within the specific exemptions provided by Section 80P(2) of the Income Tax Act.

Judgments on Section 58

Sandeep Kumar Singh, Singrauli vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Singrauli

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7/JAB/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2020-21 Sandeep Kumar Singh, Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax B. 8/116, Sect. 15, Nigahi Colony, (Appeals) Nigahi, Singrauli Pan:Bvips2456Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. Anoop Kumar Vishwakarma, Adv Revenue By: Sh. N.M. Prasad, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2025 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A), Nfac Dated 30.09.2024, Wherein The Ld. Cit(A) Has Dismissed The Appeal Of The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Ld. Ao Dated 23.09.2022, Passed Under Section 144 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under:- “1. Because, The Order Of Learned Assessing Officer As Well As The The Learned Cit(Appeals) Is Based On Incorrect Revised I.T. Return. 2. Because, The Income Offered U/S. 56 & Deduction Claimed U/S. 57 Of The Income Tax In Revised Lt. Return Does Not Relates To The Assessee. 3. Because, On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Learned Assessing Officer & The Learned Cit(Appeals) Has Erred In Making Disallowance / Addition Of Rs.51,42,446/-. 4. Because, The Learned Cit(Appeals) Has Erred In Facts In Giving Finding That "Entire Tds Credit Of Rs.81,729/- Relatable To Total Receipts Of Rs.56,61,867/- (Rs.55,09,367 + Rs.1,52,500) Is Claimed In Revised Return. Thus, It Is Clear That Whatever Income Admitted In Revised Return Is Not Randomly Admitted But Based On 16A Certificate Issued By Deductor M/S Gmr Infrastructure Ltd.

For Appellant: Sh. Anoop Kumar Vishwakarma, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. N.M. Prasad, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 56Section 57Section 58