B. R. LTD. vs. V. P. GUPTA, C.I.T., BOMBAY

CIVIL APPEAL No. 1594/1972Supreme Court[1978] 3 S.C.R. 87703 May 1978Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, V.D. TULZAPURKAR9 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

The appellant, B. R. Ltd., carried on businesses including general insurance, brokerage, commission, and import/sale of various goods. The import/sale business was closed in late 1952, resulting in an accumulated business loss of Rs. 56,488 for assessment year 1953-54. From 1953, the appellant commenced exporting textiles. The appellant claimed to set off the 1953-54 loss against profits from assessment years 1954-55, 1955-56, and 1956-57. The Income Tax Officer and Appellant Assistant Commissioner rejected this, deeming import and export businesses distinct. Revision applications to the Commissioner were also rejected. The appeals were filed by special leave.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the Commissioner was wrong in viewing the export business as different from the previous import business for the purpose of set-off. The Court reiterated that while the business must be the 'same' and not merely 'similar', determining this is fact-dependent. Objective tests for 'same business' include interconnection, inter-lacing, inter-dependency, unity of management, common fund, common place of business, and complete unity of control, with unity of control being the decisive factor. In this case, common management, organization, administration, fund, and place of business demonstrated inter-lacing and interdependence. The distinct nature of goods or procedures did not negate the 'same business' status if unity of control existed. The Court found that common control and management of the same Board of Directors, along with other factors, showed dovetailing and inter-lacing between import and export, constituting the same business. Therefore, the appellant is entitled to set off the unabsorbed loss of Rs. 56,488 from assessment year 1953-54 against profits of assessment years 1954-55, 1955-56, and 1956-57.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the business of exporting textiles constitutes the 'same business' as the previous business of importing and selling goods for the purpose of setting off unabsorbed loss under Section 24(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, as it stood prior to its amendment by the Finance Act, 1955? (Mixed question of law and fact) Assessee's Contentions: The appellant argued that the import and export businesses were not distinct and separate, and that the loss incurred in the import business should be allowed to be set off against the profits of the export business. They relied on the principle that unity of control is the decisive test, not the nature of the business. Revenue's Contentions: The revenue contended that the business of importing and selling goods was distinct and separate from the business of exporting goods. They argued that the two did not constitute the 'same business' and that since the import business was discontinued, the unabsorbed loss could not be set off against export business profits. The Commissioner relied on the distinct nature of goods and procedures involved in import versus export.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 24(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

B. R. LTD. v. V. P. GUPTA, C.I.T., BOMBAY May 3, 1978 [Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, CJ. AND V. D. TULZAPURKAR, J.J 877 lflco1ne Tax Act, 1922, S. 24(2) as it stood prior to its amendnient by the Finance Act, 1955-Interpretation of the expression "same business" occurring in S. 24(2)-Decisive tests to show the "same business" for the purpose of "set "' ofl" of loss in previous year.

The appellant used to carry on business in (i) general insurance (ii) broker· A B age and commission and (iii) import and sale of woollen fabrics, leather beltings 9 C hardware, toilet goods, chemicals and cotton fabrics etc. The business of import and sale was closed by the appellant towards the end of the calendar year 1952, corresponding to the assessment year 1953-54. In that year, the appellant suffered an accumulated business loss of Rs. 56,488/-. From the assessment year 1954-55 i.e. from the commencement of the calendar year 1953, the appellant started ex- porting textiles instead of importing woollen fabrics. The appellant claimed that the loss of Rs. 56,488/- incurred by it on the import and sale of articles should be set off against the ?rofits made by it during the assessment year

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 24(2)

All 34 judgments and leading authorities on Section 24(2) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →