SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. vs. C.I.T., HARYANA, HIMACHAL PRADESH, DELHI

CIVIL APPEAL No. 91/1976Supreme Court1990 INSC 26604 September 1990Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: K.N. SINGH, T.K. THOMMEN, KULDIP SINGH B8 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order and answering the reference in favour of the assessee. The Court held that Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is enacted to tax profits arising from the remission or cessation of trading liabilities. For this section to apply, the identity of the assessee in the previous year and the subsequent year must be the same. If there is a change in the assessee's identity, such as due to death or amalgamation where the transferor company loses its entity, the income received in a subsequent year cannot be treated as income of the original assessee. The Court emphasized that when two companies amalgamate, the transferor company loses its entity and ceases to exist. The amalgamated company acquires a new status, and it is not possible to treat the two companies as jointly liable. The true effect of amalgamation depends on the scheme, but the corporate entity of the transferor company ceases to exist from the effective date of amalgamation. Therefore, the appellant was not liable to pay tax on the Rs. 58,735.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. (appellant), was amalgamated with Indian Sugar Company (transferor company) on September 28, 1962, under court orders. The transferor company had been allowed expenditure of Rs. 58,735. For assessment year 1965-66, the appellant claimed exemption on this amount under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arguing it was not liable as the expenditure was allowed to a different entity. The Income Tax Officer and Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejected this claim. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, holding the transferor company lost its identity post-amalgamation. The High Court, however, ruled in favour of the Revenue, stating that both companies continued in a blended form and the amalgamated company was a successor-in-interest. The appellant's application for appeal to the Supreme Court was dismissed by the High Court.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the amount of Rs. 58,735 was not chargeable to tax under sub-section (1) of Section 41 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1965-66? (Question of law) Assessee's contentions: - The appellant argued that Section 41(1) is attracted only when the assessee to whom the trading liability was allowed in the previous year is the same as the assessee in the subsequent year. Since the transferor company ceased to exist after amalgamation, the appellant, a different entity, cannot be taxed on that liability. Revenue's contentions: - The Revenue contended that upon amalgamation, the companies do not cease to exist but continue their entities in a blended form. The amalgamated company is a successor-in-interest and therefore liable for the liabilities of the transferor company. The High Court supported this view.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 41(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cited by 79 judgments on BharatTax

See all citing judgments →

Counted from the text of the judgments hosted here. Most recent first.

A B c D E F G H SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD. v. C.I.T., HARYANA, HIMACHAL PRADESH, DELHI SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 [K.N ... SINGH, T.K. THOM\l!EN AND KULDIP SINGH, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961-Section 41( /)-Object and scope of.

Income-Tax Act, 1961: Section 41-Application of-Condition -Identity of assessee in previous year and subsequent year to be same-Change in the assessee's identity-No tax liability.

Income Tax Act, 1961-Section 41( 1) read with Sections 391 and 394, Companies Act, 1956--Amalgamation of two Companies-Effect- of-Exemption from tax liability granted to the transferor company whether can be claimed by the transferee company.

Under the scheme of amalgamation and order of the High Court under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 on 28.9.1962 one Indian Sugar Company was amalgamated with the appellant- assessee company. The transferor company had been allowed expendi- ture to the extent of Rs.58, 734. The appellant transferee company claimed exemption on the amount of Rs .58, 735 from income-tax for the assessment year of 1965-66 on the ground that the amalgamated trans- feree coml'any was not liable to pay tax under Section 41(1) of t

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 41(1)

All 1,943 judgments and leading authorities on Section 41(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →