HAPPY SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD., (MERGED WITH RISHI SECURITIES & FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED),KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(1),, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the assessment orders passed for AY 2016-17 and AY 2021-22 were void ab initio and quashed them. This was because the assessment orders were passed in the name of the company (Happy Suppliers Pvt Ltd) which had ceased to exist after its amalgamation with Rishi Securities & Finance Private Limited, effective from 01.04.2022.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Happy Suppliers Pvt. Ltd, filed returns declaring NIL income. A search operation led to the issuance of notices under section 148. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a show cause notice regarding differences in stamp duty value, source of cash payment for property acquisition, and cash receipts. The AO made additions under sections 69 and 69A. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed due to non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment orders passed in the name of a company that had already merged/ceased to exist were valid and not void ab initio.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 132,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 56(2)(x),Section 69,Section 69A,Section 147,Section 170A,Section 144C(1),Section 143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- PCIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.308 citing416 ITR 613 · 2019 · SC · Read judgment
- Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. v. CIT79 citing186 ITR 278 · 1990 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey
Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member:
Both the present appeals have been preferred by the assessee against separate orders dated 08.09.25 & 28.08.2025 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)-21, Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(E)’] u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) respectively. Since both the appeals relate to the assessee and facts are similar, theref
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026