SNOWTEX INVESTMENT LIMITED vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-2, KOLKATA

CIVIL APPEAL No. 4483/2019Supreme Court[2019] 8 S.C.R. 68730 April 2019Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HEMANT GUPTA INVESTMENT LIMITED15 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

The assessee, Snowtex Investment Limited, is a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) whose sole business during Assessment Year 2008-2009 was share trading. The assessee incurred losses from share trading and profits from trading in futures and options. The Assessing Officer held that the share trading loss was a speculation loss and could not be set off against profits from futures and options, as the latter were not considered speculative transactions under Section 43(5)(d). The CIT(A) upheld this view, noting Section 43(5) amendments effective from April 1, 2006. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the set-off. The Revenue appealed to the High Court, which reversed the ITAT's decision. The present appeal is against the High Court's order.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the loss from the assessee's share trading business, which was a speculation loss, could not be set off against the profits earned from trading in futures and options. This is because, for Assessment Year 2008-2009, the profits from futures and options trading did not constitute profits and gains of a speculative business as defined under Section 73 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court reasoned that while Section 43(5) was amended effective April 1, 2006, to exclude derivatives trading from speculative transactions, a corresponding amendment to the Explanation to Section 73 regarding trading in shares was only brought in with effect from April 1, 2015. The Court found no reason to consider the amendment to Section 73 as clarificatory or retrospective, emphasizing that Parliament stipulated a specific prospective effective date. Therefore, the loss from speculation business (share trading) could only be set off against profits from another speculation business, which was not the case with futures and options profits in the relevant assessment year. The appeal was dismissed.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, for Assessment Year 2008-2009, the loss from the assessee's share trading business (a speculation loss) could be set off against profits earned from trading in futures and options, which were not considered speculative transactions under Section 43(5)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee contended that the loss from share trading should be allowed to be set off against profits from futures and options. The Revenue argued that futures and options trading did not constitute speculative business profits, thus preventing set-off. 2. Whether the amendments to Section 73 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, specifically the Explanation concerning trading in shares, brought about by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014, with effect from April 1, 2015, were retrospective in nature, impacting the Assessment Year 2008-2009. The assessee implicitly argued for a retrospective application or a clarificatory nature of the amendment to allow set-off. The Revenue contended that the amendment was prospective, effective only from April 1, 2015.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 43(5),Section 73,Section 43(5)(d),Section 73(1),Section 73(4),Section 143(1),Section 143(2),Section 260A,Section 80AB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

A B C D E F G H 687 SNOWTEX INVESTMENT LIMITED v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-2, KOLKATA (Civil Appeal No. 4483 of 2019) APRIL 30, 2019 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND HEMANT GUPTA, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961: ss.43(5)(d), 73 – Assessment year 2008- 2009 – Assessee-NBFC having sole business of share trading – Transacting in future and options – Whether the speculation loss is capable of set off against the profits of trading in future and options – Held: The loss which occurred to the assessee as a result of its activity of trading in shares (a loss arising from the business of speculation) is not capable of being set off against the profits which it has earned against the business of futures and options since the latter would not constitute profits and gains of a speculative business – Finance Act, 2005.

Income Tax Act, 1961: s.73 – Amended provisions brought on the statute book after the assessment year in question – Whether retrospective in nature – Held: The Parliament amended s.43(5) with effect from 1 April 2006 in relation to the business of trading in derivatives – However, in respect of trading in shares, Parliament brought about a specific amendment

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 43(5)

All 521 judgments and leading authorities on Section 43(5) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →