VEENABEN ARVINDBHAI SHAH,AHMEDABAD vs. CPC,BENGALURU JURIS. AO-THE ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), PETLAD
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a rebate under Section 87A on their total income, which included long-term capital gains taxable under Section 112. The CPC processed the return under Section 143(1) and disallowed the rebate, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee argued that the rebate is applicable to the total income, including special rate incomes, as per the law for AY 2024-25.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible for the rebate under Section 87A for AY 2024-25, even if the income includes tax on long-term capital gains taxable at special rates. The denial by the CPC was based on system logic, not statutory mandate, and the CIT(A)'s interpretation was not in consonance with the law.
What were the issues?
Whether the rebate under Section 87A is admissible on tax on long-term capital gains taxable under Section 112 when the total income does not exceed Rs. 7,00,000/- and the assessee opts for the new tax regime under Section 115BAC(1A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD ‘SMC’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
PER : SUCHITRA KAMBLE, J M:
The appeal filed by the assessee is against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), ADDL/JCIT(A)[in short “CIT(A)”], Raipur dated 27.11.2025 for the Assessment Year (in short “AY”) 2024-25. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts of the case in upholding prima facie adjustment u/s. 143(1) of the Act made by CPC in respect of rebate claimed u/s. 87A of the Act which is a debatable an
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 87A
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Syed Kabeer Hussain, Bangalore, Karnataka vs Income Tax Officer Ward -7(2)(1) Bangalore…ITA 1540/BANG/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shrey Jain, Jodhpur vs AO, JodhpurITA 124/JODH/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- ITO, Jaipur vs Kailash Mamodia, JaipurITA 1158/JPR/2026[2025]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Bisleri International PVT.LTD, Mumbai vs. Principal Commissioner, Central Revenue Building, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Saraswat Infra And Projects, Sundergarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The State Tax Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Vedvyas Logistics Private Limited, Sundargarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Harilal Agarwalla vs. State Tax Officer, Kendrapara CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026