LISHA GAJENDRA MARLECHA ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT CPC , BANGALURU
What were the facts?
The assessee, an individual, filed a return of income including short-term capital gains. The CPC denied rebate under Section 87A against tax on these gains, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee contended they were eligible for the rebate under Section 115BAC(1A) as their total income was below the threshold.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to rebate under Section 87A even if part of the income comprises short-term capital gains chargeable under Section 111A, as there was no express statutory prohibition for the relevant assessment year.
What were the issues?
Whether rebate under Section 87A is available against tax on short-term capital gains chargeable under Section 111A for an assessee opting for the Section 115BAC regime.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “J (SMC
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE
PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 27.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Raipur [“Ld. CIT(A)”] for Assessment Year 2024–25, whereby the action of the Central Processing Centre, Bengaluru (“CPC”) in denying rebate under Section 87A of the Lisha Gajendra Marlecha 2 Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) against tax payable on short tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) against tax payable on short tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) against tax payable on short-term capital gains chargeable under Section 111A of t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 87A
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Syed Kabeer Hussain, Bangalore, Karnataka vs Income Tax Officer Ward -7(2)(1) Bangalore…ITA 1540/BANG/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shrey Jain, Jodhpur vs AO, JodhpurITA 124/JODH/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- ITO, Jaipur vs Kailash Mamodia, JaipurITA 1158/JPR/2026[2025]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026