AKSHAYSEWA BAHUUDDESHIYA SAMAJIK SANSTHA,CHANDRAPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable institution, had its application for renewal of approval under Section 80G(5) and 12AB(1)(b)(ii) rejected. The rejection was based on the assessee's failure to furnish permission under Section 36A of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950, for loans raised.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while the prescribed authority is expected to act in a time-bound manner, the ends of justice require giving the assessee an opportunity to contest the matter on merits. The issues on merits are restored to the file of the CIT(E) for a fresh hearing and decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of renewal of approval for non-furnishing of permission under Section 36A of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act was justified, and if the assessee should be given an opportunity to present its case on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH :: NAGPUR
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) (for short, “CIT(E)”), dated 13/12/2025 & 26/12/2025 respectively whereby application for regular approval under ITA Nos. 31 & 32/NAG/2026 (Akshaysewa Bahuudeshiya Samajik ) Section 80G(5) & 12AB(I)(b)(ii) respectively of the Act has been rejected.
Heard and perused the record.
The appellant is a charitable institution registered under the Societies Registration Act and had obtained permanent approval on 28th May, 2021 for the period A.Y. 2022–23 to A.Y. 2026–27. Assessee applied for renewal of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Adhishthan Community Mental Health and… vs C.I.T. Exemption, PuneITA 2320/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026
- Adhishthan Community Mental Health and Well… vs C.I.T., Exemption, PuneITA 2319/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026
- Pushpa Chandra Raj Singhvi Charitable… vs CIT(Exemption), Income Tax Appellate TribunaITA 8820/MUM/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8697/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8696/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026