ADHISHTHAN COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AND WELL BEING FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. C.I.T., EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE
What were the facts?
The assessee, Adhishthan Community Mental Health and Well Being Foundation, filed applications for regular registration under section 12AB(1)(ac)(ii) and approval under section 80G. The CIT(Exemption), Pune, rejected the application for regular registration on March 7, 2026, and the application for 80G approval on March 18, 2026. The rejection for registration was based on the assessee submitting a provisional registration under section 12AB(1)(ac)(vi) instead of a regular registration under section 12AB(1)(ac)(i) or 12A(1)(ac)(iii). The assessee contended that this was a clerical error and they fulfilled all conditions. The revenue supported the CIT's order.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the rejection of the application for regular registration by the CIT(Exemption) was based on the assessee selecting the wrong sub-clause. The Tribunal found that this was an inadvertent mistake and that the assessee had explained the facts and prayed for correction. Citing a coordinate bench decision in Shree Swaminarayan Gadi Trust Vadtal (SVG) Vs. CIT (Exemptions), Ahmedabad, the Tribunal held that a mistake in filing an entry was not fatal and could be considered in the appropriate sub-clause. The Tribunal reasoned that in the interest of natural justice and fairness, the assessee should be given an opportunity to rectify the defect. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the CIT(Exemption) to grant an opportunity to the assessee to file the correct application and decide the case on merits denovo. Since the issue of regular registration was remitted, the issue of 80G approval was also remitted for necessary adjudication. The Tribunal did not decide the merits of the application for registration or approval.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the rejection of the application for regular registration under section 12AB(1)(ac)(ii) by the CIT(Exemption) solely on the ground of selecting an inapplicable sub-clause, when all other conditions were met, is justified? (Question of law and fact, turning on Section 12AB(1)(ac)). Assessee's contention: The selection of the wrong sub-clause was a clerical error, and the assessee fulfills all the conditions provided under sections 12A/12AB of the Act. They prayed for the order to be set aside for fresh adjudication. Revenue's contention: The Ld. DR supported the order of the Ld. CIT(Exemption).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12AB(1)(ac),Section 12A(1)(ac),Section 80G(5)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “A”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The captioned appeals at the instance of appellant are against the rejection of applications for grant of regular registration u/s.12AB(1)(ac)(ii) and approval u/s.80G of the Act respectively framed by CIT(Exemption), Pune dated 07.03.2026 and 18.03.2026. 2. We first take up ITA No.2319/PUN/2026 relating to the issue of grant of regular registration. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant filed application on Form No.10AB under clause (ii) of section 12A(1)(ac) for grant of regular registration of the Act on 27.09.2025 and the same was rejected by ld.CIT(Exemption) observing as und
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)
- Adhishthan Community Mental Health and… vs C.I.T. Exemption, PuneITA 2320/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026
- Hs Ranka Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 7861/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Marwari Kanwar Sangh, Deogarh vs Exemption Ward, DhanbadITA 406/RAN/2026[2027-28]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2027-28
- Guru Bhakti Kalyan Samiti, Jaipur vs CIT(E), JaipurITA 560/JPR/2026[NA]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026
- Guru Bhakti Kalyan Samiti, Jaipur vs CIT(E), JaipurITA 559/JPR/2026[NA]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026