BAJAJ ENERGY PVT LTD ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 3(1)(1), MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under section 80IA for power generation profits. The Assessing Officer restricted this deduction to business income, excluding short-term capital gains. The assessee also disputed disallowances for provident fund interest/damages and a provision for sick leave.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the deduction under section 80IA is allowable up to the Gross Total Income, not just business income, following a Supreme Court judgment. It also directed partial allowance for provident fund interest and restoration of the sick leave provision issue for verification.
What were the issues?
Whether deduction under Section 80IA can be restricted to business income, and the allowability of expenditure related to provident fund interest and sick leave provision.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80IA,Section 80A,Section 37(1),Section 14A,Section 43B,Section 7Q,Section 14B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): These two appeals bearing ITA No.2152/Mum/2026 and ITA No.2153/Mum/2026 have been preferred by the assessee against separate orders of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, both dated 18.12.2025, arising out of assessments framed under section 143(3) read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 2018-19 and 2020-21 Bajaj Energy Pvt. Ltd., respectively. Since common facts permeate both the appeals and some of the issues arising for our consideration are interconnected, both the appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by way of this consolida
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026