RAB ENTERPRISES (INDIA) PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. THE DY CIT, CC 6(4), MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged assessment proceedings and additions related to accrued interest and Section 14A disallowance. The Revenue appealed the deletion of capital loss on share sales.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's grounds challenging assessment validity and the addition of accrued interest. However, it upheld the deletion of capital losses on share sales, partly allowing the Revenue's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether assessment proceedings were vitiated due to lack of jurisdiction and if accrued interest income was taxable. Also, whether the deletion of capital losses on share sales was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 127,Section 28,Section 14A,Section 50CA,Section 142A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BENCH: D BEFORE HON’BLE SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND HON’BLE BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA 3547/MUM/2025 निर्धारण वर्ा/Assmt. Year: 2022-23) THE DY CIT, CC 6(4) RAB ENTERPRISES (INDIA) PVT LTD 453, 4 TH FLOOR, KAUTILYA BHAVAN, C-41 TO C-43, G 307 & 308, 3 RD FLOOR, MUMBAI-400059, MUMBAI-400051, MAHARASHTRA MAHARASHTRA (अपीलार्थी Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी Respondent) ITA 3871/MUM/2025 निर्धारण वर्ा/Assmt. Year: 2022-23) RAB ENTERPRISES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL 307 & 308, 3RD FLOOR 400051, MUMBAI-400051, INDIA MAHARASHTRA MUMBAI-400059, MAHARASHTRA
Permanent Account Number of Assessee: AACCD2832Q निर्धारिती द्वधिध/Assessee represented by: None Shri Umashankar Prasad (CIT िधजस्व द्वधिध/Revenue represented by: DR) & Shri Annavaram Kosuri, SR AR
सुिवधई की तधिीख / Date of conclusion of heari
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 127
- Kishor Kumar Aggarwal, Gurgaon vs ACIT-Central Circle-30- Delhi., DelhiITA 2305/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Kishor Kumar Aggarwal, Gurgaon vs ACIT-Central Circle-30, DelhiITA 2304/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Chenna Narayana Chakka, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward 6(1), HyderabadITA 1944/HYD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Chenna Narayana Chakka, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward-6(1), HyderabadITA 1943/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Mukeshbhai Vithalbhai Javia, Rajkot vs ITO Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 649/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Pabitra Kumar Prusty vs. The Chief Commissioner , CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Innojet Projects Private Limited, Khorda vs. The Joint Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal) Central Tax And Goods And Services Tax, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Ganjam Galaxy Bhapur Barkatulla Street, Ganjam vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Lalu Kumar Bagh vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Koraput Range, KoraputOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Bhanu Metal Industries And Ors vs. Union Of INDIA And OrsCalcutta · 7 Oct 2026