SEWA SANKALP,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW
What were the facts?
The assessee initially claimed exemption under Section 10(23C) but later argued for exemption under Section 11. The assessee did not file a revised return and sought rectification of the intimation under Section 143(1) beyond the prescribed time limit.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a claim for exemption under Section 11 cannot be allowed through rectification proceedings when it was not made in the original or revised return. Furthermore, the application for rectification was filed beyond the statutory time limit prescribed under Section 154(7).
What were the issues?
Whether a new claim for exemption under Section 11 can be made via rectification, and whether the rectification application was filed within the limitation period.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 12A,Section 10(23C),Section 143(1),Section 154,Section 139(5),Section 154(7)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘SMC’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M.
(A) This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned appellate order of learned CIT(A)/Addl/JCIT(A)-1, Gurugram vide order dated 18.12.2025 for the AY 2017-18. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. Because on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the order of Ld. CIT(A) is bad in law and deserves to be quashed being illegal.
Because, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in not granting exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, despite the appellant being duly registered under section 12A a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Shree Harikrushna Velfare Trust, Bhachau vs The ITO Exemption Ward 1, Rjakot, RajkotITA 677/RJT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8697/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8696/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- M/S. Development Education & Welfare Trust… vs I.T.O., Ward - 2(3), AlipurduarITA 2367/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- M/S. Development Education & Welfare Trust… vs I.T.O., Ward - 2(3), AlipurduarITA 2366/KOL/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026