SAHKARI GANNA VIKAS SAMITI LTD.,BASTI vs. ITO, BASTI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as the assessee failed to appear and did not provide any material to distinguish its case from the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Totgar's Cooperative Sale Society Ltd. The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had also relied on this precedent.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P for its marketing activities. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) denied this claim, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Totgar's Cooperative Sale Society Ltd. The appeals were filed beyond the prescribed time and the assessee did not appear for the hearing.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the eligibility of the cooperative society for deduction under Section 80P for its marketing activities. Another procedural issue was the delay in filing the appeals and the assessee's non-appearance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT, VICE- & ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M. (A) These appeals have been filed by the assessee against the impugned appellate orders of learned CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 02.09.2024 & 24.09.2024 respectively for the AY 2014-15 & 2015-16. Grounds of appeal are as under: i. Because the order of the Id. CIT (A), NFAC dismissing appeal confirming assessment of total income at Rs. 11957082/- has been passed without giving sufficient opportunity of being heard in as much as order by the Id.
I.T.A. Nos. 654 & 660/Lkw/2024 Assessment Years:2014-15 & 2015-16 2
CIT(A) has been passed much before t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026