NOKHA AGRO SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,BIKANER vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1 , BIKANER
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 80IB(11A) for its integrated business of handling, storage, and transportation of agricultural commodities. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed this claim, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee appealed this disallowance.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee complied with the conditions for deduction under Section 80IB(11A). The conversion of a firm to a company is a succession, not reconstruction, and does not affect the deduction. Procedural defects do not override substantive eligibility.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80IB(11A) for its integrated business activities, and whether the conversion from a firm to a company impacts this eligibility.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, A.M.: This appeal by assessee is filed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeals Jaipur-5 [hereinafter referred to CIT(A)] dated 10.09.2025 with respect to Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
The Id. CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the order passed by the Id. AO which is bad in law and bad on facts and is also without proper juri iction. The Id. CIT(A) has erred in sustaining the disallowance of Rs. 1,41,52,393.00 claimed u/s 80IB(11A) of the Act, which is bad in law and bad on facts.
2 Asst. Year: 2016-17 The appellant being engaged in the acti
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IB(11A)
- Imagine Enterprises, Lucknow vs DCIT-3 Lucknow New, Pratyakshkar BhawanITA 326/LKW/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed8 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Anand Foods, Dehradun vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), KashipurITA 141/DDN/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
- Dodla Dairy Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Circle-8(1), HyderabadITTPA 1301/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed26 Nov 2025AY 2021-22
- Dodla Dairy Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT Circle -8(1), HyderabadITA 466/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: Disposed26 Nov 2025AY 2018-19
- Sahyadri Farmers Producer Company Limited… vs ACIT Circle - 1, NashikITA 951/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Bibhasa Jena vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar CommissionerateOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- M/S Otd Logistics Express Private Limited vs. The Commissioner CGST Cx And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Sangram Mallik vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Amitabh Samal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Cuttack 1Orissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Atul Kumar vs. The SuperintendentUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026