IMAGINE ENTERPRISES,LUCKNOW vs. DCIT-3 LUCKNOW NEW, PRATYAKSHKAR BHAWAN
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) which confirmed an addition of Rs. 30,37,515/-. The assessee contended that they were not given a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issues in dispute to the file of the Assessing Officer for a denovo assessment. The Assessing Officer was directed to pass a fresh order after providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deciding the appeal ex-parte without providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Whether the addition made under Section 80IB(11A) was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 80IB(11A),Section 253(3),Section 253(5)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘SMC’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M.
(A) This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned appellate order of learned CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi vide order dated 05.07.2024 for the AY 2016-17. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
That the Ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre, (NFAC), Delhi has erred in law and on facts and circumstances of the case in deciding the appeal exparte confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer.
That the Ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre, (NFAC), Delhi has failed to appreciate the facts of the case and no finding is given by him in respect of su
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IB(11A)
- Nokha Agro Services Private Limited, Bikaner vs ACIT Circle-1, BikanerITA 927/JODH/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Anand Foods, Dehradun vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), KashipurITA 141/DDN/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
- Dodla Dairy Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Circle-8(1), HyderabadITTPA 1301/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed26 Nov 2025AY 2021-22
- Dodla Dairy Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT Circle -8(1), HyderabadITA 466/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: Disposed26 Nov 2025AY 2018-19
- Sahyadri Farmers Producer Company Limited… vs ACIT Circle - 1, NashikITA 951/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smti Gollo Sarah vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 8 Oct 2026
- Abhiram Ayodhyanath Swami vs. Union Of INDIA, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 8 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Balaram Halder vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026