SHREE MARUDHAR ASHAPURAN PARSHWANATH JAIN SHWETAMBER TIRTH TRUST NUN,SIROHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS) - JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 13(1)(b) cannot be invoked at the stage of granting registration and that the CIT(E) did not comprehensively examine all objects of the trust. The Tribunal also directed the CIT(E) to condone the delay in filing the application and re-examine the matter.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a religious-cum-charitable trust, had its application for registration under Section 12AB rejected by the CIT(E). The rejection was based on the grounds that one of its objects benefited a particular religious community and that the genuineness of its activities and the source of construction expenditure were not established.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration application based on an isolated religious object and unverified genuineness of activities. Whether the delay in filing the application for registration should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH JODHPUR
PER MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Jaipur [hereinafter referred to as "the CIT(E)"]under section 12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act,
2 Shree Marudhar Ashapuran Parshwanath Jain Shwetamber Tirth Trust Nun 1961[hereinafter referred to as "the Act"], whereby the application filed by the assessee in Form No. 10AB for registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) was rejected and the provisional registration granted in Form No. 10AC on 07.04.2022 was also can
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026