JAI SHRI RAM ANATH GAUSHALA SAMITI, TARANAGAR,TARANAGAR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the mere filing of Form ITR-7 does not conclusively prove that exemption under Sections 11 and 12 was availed. The actual exclusion of income from total income is the decisive factor, which requires examination of the returns and related documents.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application, holding that the assessee had availed exemption under Sections 11 and 12 by filing returns in Form ITR-7.
What were the issues?
Whether filing of ITR-7 by itself amounts to availing exemption under Sections 11 and 12. Whether the rejection of a 12A registration application based solely on the filing of ITR-7 is sustainable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A,Section 12AB,Section 11,Section 12,Section 10(23C)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH JODHPUR
PER MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 27.09.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Jaipur [“CIT(E)”] in Form No. 10AD, in proceedings under section 12AB(1)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act,
2 Jai Shri Ram Anath Gaushala Samiti, Taranagar
1961 [“the Act”], whereby the application dated 28.02.2025 filed by the assessee in Form No. 10ABfor registration under section 12A of the Act was rejected.
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal, which are reproduced verbatim:
On the fa
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026