SHEVGOOR NAMRATHA KAMATH,BAJPE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), MANGALURU
What were the facts?
The assessee, an individual, opted for the new tax regime under section 115BAC(1A) and declared a total income below Rs. 7,00,000. This income included long-term capital gains taxable under section 112. The CPC denied the rebate under section 87A, which was upheld by the CIT(A), stating it's not available for income taxed at special rates.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that section 87A rebate is available for income taxable under section 115BAC(1A) even if it includes long-term capital gains taxable under section 112, as there is no express statutory bar for the assessment year in question. The subsequent amendment by the Finance Act, 2025, restricting this rebate, is prospective.
What were the issues?
Whether rebate under section 87A is allowable on long-term capital gains taxable under section 112 when the assessee opts for the new tax regime under section 115BAC(1A) and total income is below Rs. 7,00,000.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 87A,Section 115BAC(1A),Section 112,Section 112A(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC’ BENCH, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K
PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal has been instituted by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) passed u/s 250 of the Act dated 08.10.2025. 2. The assessee in the memo of appeal has raised 6 grounds of appeal which we for the sake of brevity and convenience, are not inclined to reproduce here. The grounds raised by the assessee are interconnected and pertains to denial of rebate u/s 87A of the Act.
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual who filed her ROI for the year the captioned AY offering an income to taxation for Rs. 6,68,040/- only. The income comprised of business inco
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 87A
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Syed Kabeer Hussain, Bangalore, Karnataka vs Income Tax Officer Ward -7(2)(1) Bangalore…ITA 1540/BANG/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shrey Jain, Jodhpur vs AO, JodhpurITA 124/JODH/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- ITO, Jaipur vs Kailash Mamodia, JaipurITA 1158/JPR/2026[2025]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Debashis Dutta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Venky Re Rolling Private Limited vs. State Of Bihar Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Bihar PatnaPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Sakti Pada Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Fakhruddin Husainibhai @ Fakhruddin Hasainbhai vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026