FT B KANAI PANCHAYAT UNION TEACHERS COOP THRIFT & CREDIT SOCIETY,VILLUPURAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VILLUPURAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before it. It then remitted the matter back to the CIT(A) to consider the Section 80P deduction claim, directing the CIT(A) to decide based on the outcome of the assessee's petition for condoning the delay in filing the original return.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative credit society, filed its return belatedly and claimed deduction under Section 80P. The Assessing Officer denied the deduction because the return was not filed within the due date. The CIT(A) upheld this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the deduction under Section 80P can be allowed when the return of income is filed belatedly. Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the ITAT should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 139(1),Section 139(4),Section 119(2),Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE KAND MS. PADMAVATHY.S
आदेश / O R D E R
PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M: This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Gurugram (in short "FAA") passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") dated 04.09.2024 for Assessment Year (AY) 2019-20.
The assessee is a cooperative credit society. The assessee for AY 2019- 20 filed a return of income belatedly u/s. 139(4) of the Act on 30.11.2020
ITA No.1577/Chny/2026 FT B Kanai Panchayat Union Teachers Cooperative Thrift & Credit Society :- 2 -:
declaring Nil income. The assessee in the said return has claimed deduction u/s. 80P of the Act to the tune of Rs. 44,64,270/-. The return was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act where the deduction u/s. 80P of the Act has been denied for the reason that the assessee did not file the return of income within due date prescribed u/s. 139(1) of the Act. Aggrieved, the assessee filed further appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on the same ground by placing reliance on the decision of the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Janki Vaishali Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. vs. CIT. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the CIT(A).
There is a delay of 476 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee has filed condonation petition/affidavit stating the reasons for delay in filing the appeal. The assessee in the affidavit has stated that the assessee being cooperative society is managed by persons who do not have any technical knowledge. The assessee further submits that it is completely dependent on the counsel with regard to income tax matters who did not provide proper support. It is also stated that the assessee while fling the return of income for the subsequent year only came to know that the appellate authority has disposed off the appeal. Accordingly, the assessee submitted that the delay is beyond the control of the assessee and the reasons are bonafide. Having heard both the parties and perused the material on record, we are of the view that there is a reasonable and sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. Therefore following the Hon’ble Supreme Court decision in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition Vs. MST.Katiji & Ors., (167 ITR 471) (SC), we condone the delay in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication.
ITA No.1577/Chny/2026 FT B Kanai Panchayat Union Teachers Cooperative Thrift & Credit Society :- 3 -:
We have heard the parties, and perused the material available on record. The Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) of the assessee during the course of hearing submitted that the assessee has filed the petition u/s. 119(2) of the Act for condoning the delay in filing the return beyond the due date prescribed u/s. 139(1) of the Act. The Ld. AR further submitted that Hon'ble Madurai Bench Madras High Court vide order dated 13.08.2025 while considering the issue of allowing the deduction u/s.80P in the case of other cooperative societies who have filed their return of income belatedly has taken a liberal view by condoning the delay. Considering the facts and circumstances peculiar to assessee's case and in the interest of natural justice, we are inclined to give one more opportunity to the assessee. Accordingly, we remit the appeal back to the CIT(A) with a direction to consider the claim of deduction u/s. 80P of the Act based on the outcome of the petition filed by the assessee for condonation of delay in filing the return of income. Needless to say that the assessee be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 01st day of June, 2026 at Chennai.
Sd/- Sd/- (जॉज� जॉज� के) (पदमावती यस) (Padmavathy.S) (George George K) उपा�� / Vice President लेखा लेखा सद�य लेखा लेखा सद�य सद�य /Accountant Member सद�य चे�नई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated: 01st June, 2026. EDN, Sr. P.S
ITA No.1577/Chny/2026 FT B Kanai Panchayat Union Teachers Cooperative Thrift & Credit Society :- 4 -:
आदेश क� �ितिल�प अ�े�षत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु!/CIT, Chennai/Madurai/Coimbatore/Salem 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड� फाईल/GF Digitally signed by EJTADA DURGA EJTADA DURGA NARESH NARESH Date: 2026.06.04 17:03:59 +05'30'
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026