SARIKABEN GOPALBHAI POLEKAR,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1, BARDOLI
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a rebate under Section 87A against tax payable on Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) while opting for the new tax regime under Section 115BAC. The CPC/AO denied this rebate, stating it was not permissible against LTCG.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 87A does not explicitly bar claiming rebate against LTCG, and the interpretation of Section 112A(6) allows for such a rebate when the total income includes LTCG. Therefore, the denial of the rebate was incorrect.
What were the issues?
Whether rebate under Section 87A is allowable against tax on Long Term Capital Gains under the new tax regime, and if interest under Sections 234B and 234C was correctly levied.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 87A,Section 112,Section 115BAC,Section 112A(6),Section 143(1),Section 234B,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT ‘SMC’ BENCH, SURAT
PER : SUCHITRA KAMBLE, J M:
The appeal filed by the assessee is against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), ADDL/JCIT(A)-4, [in short “Ld. CIT(A)”], Bengaluru, dated 19.08.2025 for the Assessment Year (in short “AY”) 2024-25. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “) The Appellant objects to the erroneous demand of Rs. 30,880/- determined vide intimation u/s 143(1). 2) The Appellant objects to non-grant of rebate in the intimation u/s 143(1) while computing the Total Tax payable by the Appellant. 3) Both lower authorities erred in not granting rebate u/s 87A of the Act of Rs. 25,000/- claimed against tax payable on long term capital gains u/s 112, even though the Act
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 87A
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer, Jhunjhunu vs Shashi Kant Tulsian, JhunjhunuITA 620/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Syed Kabeer Hussain, Bangalore, Karnataka vs Income Tax Officer Ward -7(2)(1) Bangalore…ITA 1540/BANG/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shrey Jain, Jodhpur vs AO, JodhpurITA 124/JODH/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- ITO, Jaipur vs Kailash Mamodia, JaipurITA 1158/JPR/2026[2025]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026